High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Public Interest Litigation Regarding Unspecified Government Action. The Case Involves Impleaded Respondents Including State Officials and Karnataka Public Service Commission.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "common action"
6557 result(s) found
Found 6557 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'RISO' for Rice Bran Oil Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'RISOLITE' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.
9 May 2014The Plaintiff, Kamani Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Bhuwaneshwar Refineries Pvt. Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction for trademark in...
- 96
High Court
KAHC010059832012_1
21 Jun 2016The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...
- 46
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.
21 Jun 2016The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...
- 61
High Court
- 41
High Court
- 49
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Petitions of Candidates in Kerala Higher Judicial Service Recruitment — High Court's Imposition of Minimum Marks for Viva-Voce After Written Examination Held Arbitrary and Violative of Legitimate Expectation. The Court Applied the Doctrine of Substantive Legitimate Expectation and Article 14 to Quash the High Court's Decision, Directing Selection Based on Original Aggregate Marks Criteria.
11 Jul 2023The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by eleven candidates aspiring to be selected as District Judges...
- 206
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes CVC Order Divesting CBI Director of Powers — Rule of Law and Institutional Independence Upheld. The court held that the CVC exceeded its powers under Section 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of the CVC Act, 2003 read with Section 4(1) of the DSPE Act, 1946, and that the orders were invalid as they undermined the independence of the CBI Director.
8 Jan 2019The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging the legality of three orders dated 23rd October 2018. The first order was passed by the Centra...
- 227
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Government Contract Dispute — Substantial Compliance with Section 80 CPC Sufficient. Notice under Section 80 CPC need not be pedantically scrutinized; substantial compliance with cause of action and relief indicated is adequate.
30 Apr 2019The present appeals relate to whether a notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) has been given to the State of Tamil Nadu in term...
- 551
