Search Results for "balance of convenience"

588 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 588 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Court Receiver in Partnership Dispute. Appointment of Receiver Upheld as Proper Exercise of Discretion Under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC in a Suit for Dissolution of Partnership.

The petitioners, who were defendants in a suit for dissolution of partnership and accounts, challenged the appointment of a Court Receiver over the pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for Lack of Evidence of Use and Passing Off. Marks VIVACITY and VIVZ held not deceptively similar to registered mark VIVA under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiffs, Arviva Industries (India) Ltd., filed a suit seeking an injunction against the Defendants, Vikas M. Tulsian and others, alleging infri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Ex-Parte Injunction Restraining Arbitration Proceedings in Guarantee Dispute. No Arbitration Agreement Found Between Plaintiff and Defendant No.1, Injunction Upheld to Prevent Irreparable Harm.

The dispute arises from a charter party agreement allegedly entered into between defendant no.1 (Golden Ocean Group Limited, appellant) and defendant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favor regarding the cancellation of tender acceptance and forfeiture of earnest money.

The appellant, Sunil Mantri Realty Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 29.09.2009 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction on Construction. Court holds that the appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction by granting ad-interim injunction without considering balance of convenience and prima facie case.

The petitioner, Radhika Property Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Ad-Interim Injunction in Arbitration Matter — No Irreparable Harm Shown. Court declines to interfere with interim order restraining redevelopment pending final hearing of arbitration petition under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Middle Income Group Cooperative Society Limited, filed an appeal against an ad-interim order dated 29th March 2010 passed by a learned ...