Search Results for "Section 12(1)"

1987 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1987 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders Dismissing Interlocutory Applications. The Petitions, Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, Seek Certiorari Against Orders Dated 18.06.2025 in Various KID Proceedings.

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard and reserved judgment on a batch of writ petitions filed by BDK Valves Private Limited, a company in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Hears Two Writ Petitions Regarding Regularisation of Gunthewari Layout Under Maharashtra Gunthewari Developments Act. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Order Dated 20.10.2005 Passed by Nagpur Improvement Trust.

Two writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenging an order dated 20.10.2005 passed by the Chairman, Nagpur Impr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Customs Appeals on Domestic Clearance of Duty-Free Input Products Under Advance Authorizations. Core Issue Whether Tribunal Correctly Interpreted Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 Paras 4.1.3 and 4.1.5 to Permit Domestic Sales Before Export Obligation Fulfillment.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a batch of 17 customs appeals filed by various companies and individuals against three Commissioners of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CEGAT Order for Non-Consideration of Submissions in Customs Seizure Case. Tribunal's Order Held Invalid as It Did Not Constitute a Decision in the Eye of Law Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, M/s. Wall Street Finance Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 3rd February, 2000 passed by the Customs, Excise and G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Block Assessment Case — Unexplained Investments Not Proven as Income. The court held that the Assessing Officer failed to establish that the cash credits and investments belonged to the assessee, and the ITAT correctly deleted the additions.

The case involves appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal...