Search Results for "Arbitration Act, 1940"

468 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 468 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in LPG Dealership Dispute — Termination Upheld as Valid. Arbitrator's findings on breach of agreement clauses and quantification of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Ms. Anila Gautam Jain, proprietress of M/s. Badal Agency, was appointed as a dealer by the Respondent, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Execution Case — Interest Ceases on Withdrawal of Deposited Amount. Court holds that when a decree holder withdraws a deposited amount, interest ceases to run from the date of withdrawal, even if no formal notice under Order XXI Rule 1(4) CPC is given.

The case arises from an arbitration award dated 14.04.2000, whereby the appellant, Nepa Limited, was directed to pay Rs. 14,49,300/- to the respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular First Appeals Under Section 96 CPC Against Common Judgment in Suits for Declaration, Injunction, Partition, and Dissolution of Partnership — Property Dispute Involving Sites in Mysore and Bangalore

The Regular First Appeals RFA No.37/2003 and RFA No.84/2003 were filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the common j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Passing Off Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Proprietary Rights Over Trademark 'Suratee Tobacco Company'. The Court held that the plaintiff, as a partner, cannot claim exclusive ownership of the partnership trademark without proving dissolution and assignment.

The appellant, Syed Zakirali, filed a civil suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the respondents from passing off their goods as those of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Development Agreement in Favor of Purchasers. Agreement for Development Treated as Agreement for Sale Under Specific Relief Act, 1963 as Essential Terms Constitute Sale of Immovable Property.

The appellants, original defendants, were the owners of a property in Pune. They executed a development agreement dated 18th October 2007 in favor of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice in Cooperative Bank Election Dispute. Arbitrator's Ex-Parte Order Setting Aside Nomination Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Section 84 of Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002.

The Petitioner, Mohammed Amin Haroon Solkar, a member of Kokan Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd. (Respondent No.4), challenged an arbitral award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes Pending Applications and Show Cause Notices in Scheme of Compromise Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956. Criminal Proceedings Under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 Allowed to Continue Notwithstanding Sanction of Scheme.

The matter arose from a scheme of compromise and arrangement proposed by Europlast India Ltd. under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. The unsecu...