Search Results for "Andhra Pradesh Act 1986"

539 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 539 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Appointment of Receiver in Partition Suit. Notice of Motion Seeks Interim Relief for Joint Family Properties Allegedly Misappropriated by Co-Owners.

The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that he is entitled to a 1/10th share in the assets and properties of the joint family and for partition by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Gram Panchayat Adhikari Recruitment Dispute — Waiting List Not Permissible Under 2015 Rules. Division Bench erred in directing consideration of candidates beyond the select list as 2015 Rules override 1978 Rules and do not provide for a waiting list.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court Division Bench. The dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Rejects Maintainability Objection in Appointment Dispute Under Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act. Writ Petition Challenging Selection as Assistant Manager MIS Held Maintainable as Petitioner Not an Employee and Alternate Remedy Does Not Bar Jurisdiction Under Section 70.

The petitioner, T.B. Venugopal, applied for the post of Assistant Manager MIS in the Tumkur Milk Producers Co-operative Societies Union Limited pursua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by Foreign Shareholder Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 272(1)(e) Companies Act, 2013. Section 272(1)(e) is not ultra vires the Constitution; second proviso to Section 272(3) does not apply to petitions under Section 272(1)(e).

The petitioner, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius and a shareholder of Devas Multimedia Pr...