Search Results for "Administrative Tribunal jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Administrative Tribunal jurisdiction"

2514 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2514 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 as Ultra Vires Constitution; Interim Assurance Recorded Against Appointments and De-notification. Petitioners argued that de-recognition of Waqf by user, special provision for Government property under Section 3C, and non-Muslim majority in Waqf bodies under Sections 9 and 14 violate Articles 14, 15, 25, 26 of Constitution.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. The petitioners,...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Challenge to Arbitral Award Directing Payment of Rs.9,28,188.45 with Interest. The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from a member-client dispute over stock market transactions and margin shortfalls.

14 Oct 2014

The petitioner filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Bom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Quashing of Departmental Enquiry Against Income Tax Commissioner. Administrative Tribunal Cannot Pre-judge Charges at Initial Stage.

3 Mar 2005

The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bombay Bench, which quashed departmental proceed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order Reinstating Suspended Police Officer Due to Non-Review Under Rule 3(8) of All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969. Continued suspension beyond 90 days without mandatory review renders suspension illegal and without authority of law.

6 Jan 2012

The State of Maharashtra and the Director General of Police filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Port Trust's Challenge to Industrial Tribunal Award Setting Aside Disciplinary Enquiry. Enquiry Found Vitiated Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Perverse Findings Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

2 Feb 2005

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai (Petitioner) challenged an award dated 18th May, 1999 passed by the Presiding Officer of the Central Gover...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Dispute Over Termination of a Medical Practitioner — Finds Hospital's Termination Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court Modified Back Wages to 50% for the Period from Termination to Labour Court Award and Full Back Wages Thereafter.

5 Apr 2011

The case involves a dispute between N.M. Wadia Charitable Trust Hospital, Solapur (appellant) and Dr. Ashok Vyankatesh Apte (respondent), a full-time ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Competing Claims Over Water Allocation from Upper Wardha Dam and Considers Constitutional Validity of Article 371(2) Governor’s Directives. Court Directs Interim Water Supply for 2012-13 and Frames Issues on Legality of Allocation and Binding Nature of Directives but Final Decision Not Contained in Available Text.

2 Mar 2013

The dispute arose from the allocation of 87.60 million cubic meters (MCM) of water from the Upper Wardha Dam in Amravati district, Maharashtra, to a t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in BSF Disciplinary Case — Commandant's Power to Order Additional Record of Evidence Upheld. The Court held that the Commandant had jurisdiction to direct preparation of additional RoE under Rule 51 of BSF Rules, 1969, and that reasons for conviction need not be recorded by SSFC or appellate authority under Section 117(2) of BSF Act, 1968.

3 Dec 2021

The Union of India and officials of the Border Security Force appealed against a judgment of the Calcutta High Court which quashed disciplinary procee...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Judgment That Struck Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Notifications Under Environment (Protection) Act. Review Petition Seeks Recall Citing Overlooked Binding Precedents.

1 Jan 1970

Background: The present matter is a review petition arising from the Supreme Court's judgment in Vanashakti v. Union of India, dated 16 May 2025, whic...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Objections to Maintainability and Limitation in Suit for Recovery of Trust Property. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Suit for Recovery of Shares by Public Charitable Trusts Not Barred by Limitation.

19 Sep 2016

The case concerned a notice of motion taken out by two public charitable trusts, the J.V. Gokal Charity Trust and Shree Krishna Foundation, against Co...

39 40 41 42 43

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)