Search Results for "wrong rule"

4956 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4956 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Interim Compensation Order in Lease Dispute. Appellate court's order granting interim compensation under Section 43(1) of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 upheld as compensatory and not penal.

The petitioners, heirs of the original lessee Hashambhai Jetha, were granted a lease of a plot of land admeasuring 3341 sq. yards by an Indenture of L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Daily Wage Employees Challenging Termination — Appointments Were Irregular and Not Entitled to Regularisation. Termination Due to Completion of Project Is Not Illegal and Industrial Disputes Act Does Not Apply to Zilla Parishad.

The petitioners, 24 daily wage employees of Zilla Parishad, Dhule, filed writ petitions challenging their termination of services. They were appointed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Second Appeal Against Partition Decree; Challenge to Lower Appellate Court's Grant of 1/4th Share in Joint Family Properties. Plaintiff Claimed Share via Will but Court Rejected Will Yet Allowed Partition, Now Appellants Contend Family Settlement Extinguished All Shares.

The second appeal before the Bombay High Court arises out of a partition suit. The plaintiff, Smt. Sushila, filed a suit for declaration, partition, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...