WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2003
21 Dec 2018The petitioners, K.P. Power Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition in 2003 before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to compel ...
Search Results for "tax entry"
1507 result(s) found
Found 1507 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Agricultural Produce Market Committees in Service Tax Case on Exemption Grounds. The court upheld service tax liability for renting immovable property pre-01.07.2012, ruling that the activity was not a statutory duty under the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 and exemption under Circular No.89/7/2006 does not apply.
23 Feb 2022The Supreme Court of India, in a judgment delivered by Justice M.R. Shah, addressed a group of appeals filed by various Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti (Agri...
- 305
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Pre-Deposit Dispute — Protest Payment Can Be Adjusted Against Mandatory Pre-Deposit for Appeal. The Court held that under Section 26(6A) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, amounts paid under protest before assessment can be adjusted against the 10% pre-deposit required for appeal, as the provision requires 10% of disputed tax, not arrears.
3 Dec 2021The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by VVF (India) Limited against the State of Maharashtra and others, setting aside the Bombay High Court's judgment...
- 235
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Cash Credit Case — Upholds Addition Under Section 68 Despite Rejection of Books for Gross Profit. Books of Account Can Be Partially Relied Upon for Different Additions Even After Rejection Under Section 145(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961.
24 Apr 2020The appeal arose from a challenge to an addition of Rs.2,26,000 made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as unexplained cash credits. The ap...
- 216
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Assessment Orders Under BST Act — Holds That Tribunal's Order Dated 20/01/2015 Has Prospective Effect Only. The assessing authority acted without jurisdiction in passing assessment orders for 2013-14 contrary to the directions of this Court in Writ Petition No. 2217 of 2015.
18 Apr 2019The petitioners, Reliance Industries Ltd. and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...
- 141
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Clarification on Tax Rate for Blood Bank Equipments Under KVAT Act, 2003 — Goods Held to Fall Under Entry 61 of Third Schedule as Medical Equipment. The court quashed the Commissioner's clarification that Blood Collection Monitors, Blood Storage Refrigerators, Deep Freezers, Platelet Agitators with Incubators, Plasma Expressers, and Cryobaths are not medical equipment under Entry 61 of the Third Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.
11 Sep 2017The petitioner, Aditya Surgical Co., a dealer in blood bank equipments and other medical equipments, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...
- 79
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Remands Kerala Luxury Tax on Tobacco Case to High Court for Determination of Trade Restriction Under Article 301. High Court Must First Find Infringement of Article 301 Before Considering Article 304(b) Saving, Clarifying Kalyani Stores Decision.
30 Jul 1969The case involved a challenge to the Kerala Luxury Tax on Tobacco (Validation) Act, 1964, enacted after the Supreme Court invalidated earlier rules fo...
- 34
High Court
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT. Tribunal's order set aside for failing to consider the TPO's detailed analysis and rejecting comparables without proper reasoning under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
27 Feb 2020The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 6 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appe...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of DFIA Application for Maize Starch Powder Export. Court holds that the product 'Maize Starch Powder' is not covered under SION entry E75 which specifies 'Maize Starch', and the petitioner failed to comply with the requirement of submitting proof of export within the prescribed time limit under the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20.
29 Mar 2019The petitioner, Shah Nanji Nagsi Exports Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in export business, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of its appli...
- 99
