Search Results for "registration rules"

4159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment — Prior Agreement Valuation Binding. Sale Deed Executed in Conformity with Assessed Agreement Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 31A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Goa Amendment).

The petitioners, Mr. Sameer Vasudev Morajkar and Mrs. Prithvi B. Dessai, executed a sale deed dated 16.12.2020 in respect of property measuring 1900 s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Order in Property Dispute Due to Limitation. Delay of Over 3 Years in Challenging Ex-Parte Decree Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Held Not Sufficiently Explained.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the Plaintiff/Applicant, Smt. Gopi, widow of Tarachand R. Advani, seeking to set aside an ex-parte order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Madras High Court Decision on Validity of Security Bond and Priority in Rateable Distribution. Charge Created by Security Bond Held Valid Despite Lack of Attestation; Decree Holder Entitled to Priority Under Section 73(1) Proviso (c) Code of Civil Procedure.

The appellant (M. L. Abdul Jabhar Sahib) instituted C.S. No. 56 of 1953 on the Original Side of the Madras High Court against Hajee Ahmed Batcha for r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RTI Disclosure of Contractual Information Between Private Companies and Government. Information Sought Relates to Public Activity and Falls Under Section 2(h) of RTI Act as 'Public Authority'.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s Shonkh Technology International Ltd. and M/s United Telecom Limited challenging orders of the St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd. v. Suresh Kumar Jasraj Burad. The court found that the marks 'MERELANE' and 'MARICELL' are deceptively similar and granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark 'MARICELL'.

The appellant, Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for infringement of its registered trademark 'MERELANE' and for passing off against the res...