Search Results for "penalty confirmation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "penalty confirmation"

435 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 435 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Additional FSI Approval as Abuse of Process. Court finds lack of bonafides and imposes costs of Rs. 5,00,000 for misuse of public interest litigation jurisdiction.

27 Sep 2022

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Sarthi Seva Sangh and another petitioner, challenging the approval of an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Condonation of Delay in Restoration of Suit — Limitation Period for Filing Restoration Application Not Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court upheld the trial court's order condoning a 10-year delay in filing restoration application, holding that Article 137 does not apply to restoration applications and the court has inherent power under Section 151 CPC.

14 Dec 2022

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants (original defendants) challenging the judgment and order dated 04.05.2022 passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Decide Sanction Validity as Preliminary Issue in Corruption Case. Validity of sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 need not be decided as preliminary issue; Commissioner of Municipal Corporation is competent authority to grant sanction.

14 Dec 2021

The applicant, an employee of Mira Bhaindar Municipal Corporation, was prosecuted by the Anti Corruption Bureau for offences under Section 7 read with...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Discharge of District Judge in NSEL Scam Case — Rule 13(4)(ii)(b) of MJS Rules Violates Articles 14 and 311(2) as It Imposes Penalty Without Inquiry. The court held that discharge of a probationer without inquiry is punitive and unconstitutional.

30 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Ajay Ramesh Dinode, was appointed as a District Judge by nomination in August 2014 and posted as Additional District and Sessions Judg...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed Due to Failure to Prove Title and Possession. Court holds that plaintiffs must establish title and possession independently, and that a co-owner in exclusive possession of a portion cannot be dispossessed without due process of law.

25 Sep 2025

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of BSF Constable in Cattle Smuggling Bribery Case. Summary Security Force Court's order of dismissal under Sections 40 and 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968, and Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, was found to be legal and proper, with no violation of natural justice.

16 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Kantilal Bhanudas Dukare, was a constable in the Border Security Force (BSF) posted at Churiantpur border post on the Indo-Bangladesh ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Disqualify Panchayat Member for Conflict of Interest Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 — Respondent Used Official Position to Obtain NOC for Spouse's Business, Violating Section 10(1)(h).

3 May 2011

The petitioner, a resident and voter of Verla Canca village, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry and Unnatural Death Within Seven Years of Marriage. Conviction under Section 304-B IPC and Section 3 of Dowry Prohibition Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients of dowry death.

25 Oct 2025

The appellants, Raju Appasab Ghend, Appasab Siddappa Ghend, and Smt. Laxmibai W/o Appasab Ghend, were convicted by the learned VI Addl. District & Ses...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against SARFAESI Auction Sale for Lack of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner's challenge to auction sale of secured assets fails as remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act before DRT was not exhausted.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Umang Sugars Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the auction sale of movable and immovable...

38 39 40 41 42

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)