Bombay High Court Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Occupation of Godowns at Sassoon Dock. The Cases Involve Disputes Between Port Authority, State Fisheries Corporation, and Multiple Private Occupants.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "bombay tenancy act"
1755 result(s) found
Found 1755 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Trust Property Dispute — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted by Bombay Public Trusts Act. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Maintainable as Dispute Involves Title, Not Just Trust Administration.
3 Aug 2005The petitioners (original defendants) filed a civil revision application challenging the order of the District Court which set aside the trial court's...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Recovery of Business Premises — Conducting Agreement Not Proved as License; Relationship of Licensor-Licensee Not Established. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove the conducting agreement and the defendant's possession was adverse, barring the suit by limitation.
19 May 2020The appellants (original defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 20th March 2007 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court, which decreed the...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Decree in Tenancy Land Suit — Consent Award Without Scrutiny of Tenancy Proceedings Held Void. Court holds that Lok Adalat award based on consent terms in a suit involving agricultural land is illegal when the civil court had earlier directed examination of pending tenancy proceedings under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.
18 Dec 2014The petitioners, who were plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No.14 of 2012, filed a suit for injunction concerning agricultural lands. On 17 March 2012,...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Amendment Extending Period for Acquisition of Reserved Land Under Section 127(1) of MRTP Act Applies to Notices Served Before Amendment — Landowner's Right to Deemed Lapse Not Affected Retrospectively.
3 Sep 2019The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arising from a writ petition concerning the interpretation of Section 127(1) of...
- 129
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 Between Two Government Companies. Key Issue Involves Scope of Act and Validity of Second Eviction Notice Based on Security Ground Not Mentioned in Original Termination Notice.
17 Dec 2012The petitioner, Indian Petro Chemicals Corporation Limited, a Government company, occupied premises on the 9th and 19th floors of Air India Building, ...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Condition in NOC Requiring Clubbing of 22 Companies as Single Occupant. Court Directs MHADA to Treat Petitioner as Separate Tenant in Redevelopment Project Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
3 Jan 2022The Petitioner, Alice Realties Pvt Ltd, a private limited company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bom...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Lease Renewal Dispute — Option to Renew Lease Must Be Exercised Before Expiry of Term, Not After. Lease renewal option cannot be exercised after expiry of term; tenant holding over after expiry does not create right to renewal under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
29 Apr 2010The case involves a dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), the applicant/defendant, and Navjeevan Co-operative Housing Society L...
- 131
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Execution Orders — Decree Holder Entitled to Possession Despite Alleged Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. Execution Court Cannot Go Behind Decree; Objections Under Section 47 CPC Not Maintainable.
14 Mar 2019The applicants (judgment-debtors) filed a civil revision application challenging two orders dated 31/07/2018 and 30/10/2018 passed by the Senior Civil...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Application for Possession of Tenanted Premises from Official Liquidator in Company Liquidation — Tenancy Rights Not Assets Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956. Monthly tenancy rights do not constitute assets of the company in liquidation; the Company Court can direct handover of possession where the Official Liquidator's need is not genuine.
12 Mar 2025The applicants, as landlords of Flat Nos. 4 and 5 in Jaitirath Mansion, Barrack Road, Mumbai, filed an application under Section 446 of the Companies ...
- 485
