Bombay High Court hears Writ Petition concerning land acquisition for Panvel-Virar-Alibaug Multipurpose Corridor project. The petition challenges acquisition proceedings and seeks adequate compensation and rehabilitation.
8 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Share Valuation"
549 result(s) found
Found 549 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Petition Challenging Age Limit for Adoptive Mother's Maternity Benefit; Declares Section 60(4) of Code on Social Security, 2020 Unconstitutional. The Court Held That Restricting Benefit to Child Below Three Months Violates Articles 14 and 21 by Creating Arbitrary Classification and Denying Reproductive Autonomy.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court adjudicated a public interest petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 60(4) of the Code on Social Security, 2020, whic...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Seeking Dereservation of Reserved Plot Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. Dispute Centers on Whether Purchasers of Final Plot Have Locus Standi to Issue Purchase Notice and Whether Failure to Acquire Land Within Six Months Results in Automatic Dereservation.
13 Aug 2010The Bombay High Court heard a batch of four writ petitions involving a common question of law and fact arising from the Jalgaon Town Planning Scheme I...
- 15
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Plaintiff's Claim for Possession in Property Dispute Based on Title and Rejects Adverse Possession Defense. Licensee's Possession Cannot Be Converted into Adverse Possession Without Clear Evidence of Ouster.
26 Aug 2020The dispute pertained to a suit property in Bangalore. The original plaintiff, A. Krishnappa, claimed ownership of the property as joint family proper...
- 323
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit, Remands for Fresh Disposal on Merits. Lower Appellate Court Failed to Decide Appeal on Merits, Violating Duty Under Section 96 CPC.
8 Jul 2014The appellant-plaintiff filed a second appeal before the Bombay High Court against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate court which had dism...
- 244
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint and Impleadment of Parties in Property Dispute — Amendment Sought Before Commencement of Trial Allowed as No Prejudice Caused. Order VI Rule 17 CPC permits liberal amendment before trial; impleadment under Order I Rule 10 CPC allowed for complete adjudication.
1 Aug 2014The plaintiffs, Sharayu Ramkrishna Mhatre and Anjali Deepak Karnik, filed a suit (Suit No. 1964 of 2012) in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaratio...
- 141
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Injunction Application in Share Transfer Dispute — Agreement for Sale of Shares Not Enforceable as Contract for Sale of Shares, Not Specific Performance of Immovable Property. Court holds that agreement for transfer of shares is a contract for sale of goods and not for specific performance of immovable property, and plaintiff failed to show readiness and willingness.
8 Dec 2014The plaintiff, Swaran Salaria & Associates, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 22 November 2007 with the first defendant, Him...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Trial Court's Jurisdiction Ruling in SARFAESI Act Suit. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Permanent Injunction Against Re-auction of Mortgaged Property Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions.
16 Apr 2015The respondent, original plaintiff, filed Regular Civil Suit No.1756 of 2014 seeking a permanent injunction restraining the applicant bank from re-auc...
- 147
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears and Reserves Order on Interim Measures in Intellectual Property Dispute with Foreign Seated Arbitration. Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act Questions Indian Court's Jurisdiction and Maintainability of Mandatory Injunction.
31 Jul 2026The applicant, a Singapore-incorporated company engaged in software development, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...
- 85
High Court
High Court of Bombay Directs Re-adjudication of 21 Employees' Claims; Dispute on Interest and Bonus Under Winding-Up Not Resolved in Extracted Judgment Text. The court granted partial relief by allowing prayer (b) for re-adjudication of claims of 21 workmen due to discrepancies, while the final decision on prayer (a) concerning statutory interest, bonus, and provident fund contribution under the Companies Act, 1956 is not discernible from the incomplete text.
4 Aug 2006The case concerns a company application filed by the Engineering Workers Association, representing 121 employees of M/s. Poysha Industrial Co. Ltd., w...
- 48
