Search Results for "warehouse removal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "warehouse removal"

81 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claims for Exported Cables in Central Excise Case — Emphasizes Substantive Compliance Over Procedural Technicalities. Revisional Authority Must Consider Merits, Not Merely Endorse Lower Authorities' Findings Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

24 Apr 2013

The petitioner, UM Cables Limited, is a manufacturer of Polyethylene Insulated Jelly filled Copper Cables and Optical Fiber Cables, falling under tari...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Octroi Levy on Imported Aircraft Parts in Customs Bonded Warehouse — Entry into Municipal Limits Occurs Upon Removal from Warehouse. Interpretation of 'Goods' and 'Entry' Under Section 192 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Confirms Levy is Valid and Not Ultra Vires.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Jet Airways (India) Ltd. and Reliance Commercial Dealers Ltd. challenging the levy of octroi by the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union’s Excise Duty Demand on Steel Wires; Manufacturer’s Challenge Dismissed. Interpretation of Item 26AA of Central Excise Act as a Rate of Duty, Not Dependent on Origin of Raw Material, Confirmed.

18 Oct 1968

The case arose from the imposition of excise duty under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, on steel wires manufactured by the appellant, J.K. Ste...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Imported Textile Machinery — Holds That Show Cause Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 Is Time-Barred. The court quashed the show cause notice as the department failed to establish any fraud or suppression to justify the extended period of limitation.

20 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Karl Mayer STOLL Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH and M/s. Karl Mayer India Private Limited, imported textile machinery and cleared the goo...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Writ Petitions by Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation Against Co-operative Bank and Borrowers in Recovery Proceedings Under SARFAESI Act — Petitions Challenging Auction Sale and Possession Found Premature as Statutory Remedies Under Section 17 Not Exhausted.

8 Jul 2022

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by the Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation (the petitioner) challenging the actions of the P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Sugar Factories and Distilleries Against State of Maharashtra Regarding Excise Transport Fees. Petitioners Challenged Validity of Transport Fee Demands Under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

1 Jan 1970

The Bombay High Court, in exercise of its civil appellate jurisdiction, adjudicated a batch of fifty-one writ petitions filed by various sugar factori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Rebate Claim as Time-Barred Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act — Export Date Determines Limitation Period, Filing of ARE-1 Not a Substitute for Rebate Claim.

29 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Everest Flavours Ltd., exported a consignment of 360 drums containing Menthol Crystals to Bangkok on 12 February 2006. The shipping bi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in National Green Tribunal Act Case Upholding Illegal Storage Facility Removal. Ex Post Facto Clearance Under 2011 Notification Invalid as Storage Terminal Not Located 'In' Notified Port Under Paragraph 8 of Environment Protection Act, 1986.

1 Feb 2023

The appeals were lodged under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, challenging the National Green Tribunal's order that set aside an e...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tender Cancellation by Central Warehousing Corporation — No Arbitrariness Found in Cancellation of Tender for Handling and Transport Contract. The court held that the decision to cancel the tender was based on legitimate concerns regarding financial capacity and was not arbitrary, and that bidders have no vested right until the contract is awarded.

18 Apr 2019

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shri Siddhivinayak Enterprises and Nagnath Gangadharrao Paldewar challenging the cancellation of a t...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)