Search Results for "vehicle registration details"

280 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 280 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Sufficient Evidence of Vehicle Involvement. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim Petition Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Despite FIR and Panchnama Showing Involvement of Offending Vehicle.

The present appeal was filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the original claimants, Simkiben Bhanabhai Rathod and another, being...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Sufficient Evidence of Vehicle Involvement. Tribunal erred in dismissing claim petition under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 despite FIR, panchnama, and eyewitness testimony establishing involvement of offending vehicle.

The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was filed by the original claimants, Simkiben Bhanabhai Rathod and another, again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Rash and Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a road accident on 30.10.2016 at about 2.15 p.m. on Mohanur to Karur Road near Vangal Bridge. The defacto complainant Jagadeeswar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim in MFA No.102828/2014. Court allowed appeal under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, enhancing compensation from Rs.1,50,000 to Rs.2,50,000 with interest at 6% per annum.

The appellant, Shri Ninganagouda, filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 16.09...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Directions to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals for Compliance with Procedural Rules. Court Holds That Insistence on Personal Appearance of Claimants at Filing Is Not Mandatory Under Rule 254(2) of Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Anil Prabhakar Tadkalkar, a practicing advocate, raising several issues concerning the disposal of claim ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Interim Directions in Drunk Driving PIL Pending Appeal Against Acquittal of Actor. Court Notes Large Number of Recent Cases Under Section 185 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Directs Interim Measures.

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) arises from an incident on 28 November 2002 in Mumbai, where the fourth respondent, a popular Hindi film star, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Injured Claimant and Dismisses Appeal by Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Enhanced for Head Injury and Permanent Disability. Claimant awarded Rs. 8,50,000 with interest at 6% per annum from date of petition.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 25.11.2006, when the claimant, P. Bharath, a 20-year-old student, was riding his bicycl...