Search Results for "undivided shares"

269 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 269 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Appeal Suit Challenging Partition Decree. Trial Court Ordered Partition of Suit Properties into 25 Equal Shares with 19/25 Share to Plaintiffs.

The appeal arises from the decree of the Additional District Judge, Chengalpattu, in O.S.No.243 of 2005, whereby the trial court ordered partition of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Suit Plaintiff's Writ Petition, Sets Aside Appellate Order That Reversed Trial Court's Injunction. Court Holds That a Consent Deed Is a Valid Conveyance and That a Plaintiff in Possession Through Vendors Is Entitled to Injunction Against Trespasser.

The petitioner, Balwant Krishna Thorat, filed a Regular Civil Suit No.208 of 2020 seeking partition of his share in the suit property and an injunctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Concurrent findings of fact regarding joint family status and limitation cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC.

The appellants, along with one Ramappa, filed a suit for declaration, partition, and separate possession of suit schedule properties, alleging the exi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Invalidity of Partnership Between HUF Karta and Its Member in Income Tax Registration Case. Partnership Deed Between Karta and Coparcener of Same HUF Held Void as No Valid Contract Possible Under Section 4 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Trib...