Search Results for "tariff classification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "tariff classification"

112 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 112 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Captive Power Producers in Hydel Policy Dispute Over Water Royalty Charges. The court held that the agreements incorporating the government policy did not impose water royalty liability on captive power producers, distinguishing them from independent power producers under the policy framework.

6 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by M/s. Indsil Hydro Power and Manganese Limited (INDSIL) and Carborundum Universal Limited (CUMI) against a comm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Importer in Customs Classification and Valuation Dispute — Head End Equipment Classified Under CTH 8543 8999 and Software/Service Charges Included in Assessable Value. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the imported goods constituted a complete functional unit and that the appellant's mis-declaration of classification and value justified penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962.

27 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Electricity Ombudsman's Order Allowing Refund of Excess Tariff Charged to Industrial Consumer. Limitation Period Under MERC Regulations Not Applicable to Continuing Wrong of Wrongful Billing at Commercial Tariff Instead of Industrial Tariff.

18 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged the order dated 22/01/2016 passed by the Electricity O...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice and Order in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Stators and Rotors of Hermetic Motors Classifiable as Parts of Electric Motors, Not Compressors. Approved Classification Lists Cannot Be Reopened Without Fresh Material Under Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

23 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, challenged a show cause notice dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Settlement Commission's Majority Decision Rejecting Settlement Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case. Majority view prevails over minority view under Section 127I of the Customs Act, 1962 when there is a difference of opinion among Members.

16 Sep 2016

The petitioners, Under Water Services Company Limited and others, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Excise Duty Rate on Cranes — Enacted Statute Prevails Over Discrepancy in Bill Versions. Rate of Duty Under Heading 84.26 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 is 15% Ad Valorem, Not 12% as Claimed by Manufacturer.

31 Jul 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Garlick Engineering, a manufacturer of cranes, filed a writ petition challenging the rate of central excise duty applicable to cr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Interest Under Section 11AA Not Payable When Goods Cleared Under Provisional Assessment. Court holds that interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not attracted when goods are cleared pending finalisation of classification list, as the assessment is provisional.

20 Mar 2012

The appellant-assessee, originally known as Morris Electronics Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of soft ferrite components. It filed a classificat...

High Court

High Court Quashes CGRF Order Directing Revision of Energy Bills for HT Consumer on Express Feeder. Interpretation of 'Dedicated Distribution Facilities' under MERC Supply Code Regulations 2005 determines consumer classification.

21 Jun 2011

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extended Period Demand Under Section 11A of Central Excise Act — Suppression of Facts Justifies Extended Limitation. Forgings Classified Under Chapter 84 as Machinery Parts, Not Eligible for Exemption Under Notification No.223/88.

24 Aug 2010

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s Rajkumar Forge Limited and its director challenging orders of the Commissioner of Central...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)