Search Results for "takeover regulations"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "takeover regulations"

40 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

6 May 2026

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Appellants -- Upholds Committee of Creditors' Approval of Sarda Energy and Minerals Limited's Resolution Plan Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 -- Doctrine of Commercial Wisdom Affirmed in Insolvency Resolution

27 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court upheld the approval of a Resolution Plan by Sarda Energy and Minerals Limited (SEML) for SKS Power Generation (Chhattisgarh) Ltd. un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Railway Land Demolition — No Encroachment Rights on Railway Land. Petitioners failed to establish any legal right to occupy railway land, and the demolition was lawful under the Railways Act, 1989.

19 Mar 2024

The petitioners, seven individuals, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the demolition of their structures on land claimed to b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Banking Investment Dispute - Failure of Respondent to Nominate Arbitrator Triggers Court's Power Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising out of an Agreement dated 18th April, 2018 and Deed of Guarantee dated 18th April, 2018, as the respondent failed to nominate an arbitrator.

17 Jul 2023

The applicant, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., a public company and banking company, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Concili...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part on Operational Creditor Status but Upholds Dismissal on Limitation in Insolvency Case. The court held that a purchaser does not qualify as an operational creditor under Section 5(20) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the application under Section 9 was barred by limitation due to debt arising from 2013 transactions.

4 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Commercial Suit — Appellant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. The court held that the appellant's failure to appear despite service and the lack of a valid explanation for the delay in filing the application to set aside the decree disentitled it to relief under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

27 Nov 2020

The appellant, BVM Finance Private Limited, was the original defendant No.1 in a commercial suit filed by the respondent No.1, Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Condition Imposed by IDBI Bank in Debt Restructuring — Unilateral Imposition of Prepayment Premium Without Contractual Basis Held Arbitrary. Writ of Certiorari Granted Against Condition Requiring Payment of Prepayment Premium on Premature Repayment of Loan Under Master Restructuring Agreement.

27 Jun 2019

The petitioners, United Spirits Limited and USL Benefit Trust, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

26 Jul 2018

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions Challenging Mumbai Port Trust's Summary Eviction Notices Under Bye-law No.9. Petitioners Sought Declaration That Bye-law No.9 Ultra Vires Public Premises Act and Violated Natural Justice.

27 Mar 2018

In a batch of writ petitions, occupants of structures at Reay Road, Mazgaon, Mumbai, challenged eviction notices issued by the Mumbai Port Trust on 06...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination Clause in Employment Contract. Clause 12(c)(ii) allowing termination without cause held not unconscionable or contrary to public policy under Section 23 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

6 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Ms. Jayshree Gururaj, was appointed as Senior Director (Advanced Services) in Cisco Systems (India) Private Limited on 15 May 2012. He...

2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)