Search Results for "street widening"

67 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 67 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to NHAI Eviction Order in Land Acquisition Case. Patta Not Conclusive Proof of Title After Acquisition Under National Highways Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Mr. M. Paulpandian, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 07.10.2024 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging NHAI Eviction Notice for Encroachment on National Highway Land. Land Vests Absolutely with NHAI Under Section 3A of National Highways Act, 1956 Once Declaration Is Made, and Petitioner Cannot Claim Ownership Based on 'Grama Natham' Classification.

The petitioner, S. Muruganandham, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court challenging a proceeding dated 02.04.2025 issued by the Highways ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encroachments for Road Widening — Land Occupied by Assignees of Grama Natham Land, Not Encroachers. The court held that no mandamus can be issued against lawful assignees and that the petitioner already has access via the Housing Board road.

The petitioner, Mrs. Lalitha Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Tahsildar (3r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developers' Challenge to PMC's Differential Development Charges Policy. Held that imposing higher development charges on properties within 100 meters of DP road while exempting others violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, a group of developers and a real estate association, challenged the policy of the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) that imposed highe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular First Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Appeal fails as appellants failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and no substantial question of law arose.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Shirdi — Held That No Notice Under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Is Required Before Demolition of Unauthorized Structures Under Section 52.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by residents of Shirdi challenging the demolition of their structures by the Shirdi Nagar Panchayat. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs BMC to Provide Alternate Premises to Disabled Petitioner After Illegal Demolition of Stall. License Under Section 394 of MMC Act, 1888 Does Not Authorize Structure on Public Land, but Demolition Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Mohd. Sayed Mohd. Salim Nagori Rizvi, a person with 100% hearing disability, filed a writ petition seeking reconstruction of his stall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition of Unauthorized Structure in Jira Galli. Notice Under Section 314 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 Held Valid as Structure Was on Street and No Prior Notice Required.

The appellant, Bashir Nazir Sayyed, was the original plaintiff who filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay seeking a declaration that a notice ...