Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging NHAI Eviction Notice for Encroachment on National Highway Land. Land Vests Absolutely with NHAI Under Section 3A of National Highways Act, 1956 Once Declaration Is Made, and Petitioner Cannot Claim Ownership Based on 'Grama Natham' Classification.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 85
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, S. Muruganandham, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court challenging a proceeding dated 02.04.2025 issued by the Highways and Administrative Officer of the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), which asked the petitioner to vacate an encroached portion of land. The petitioner claimed ownership of the property, which he described as 'Grama Natham' land, and argued that NHAI had no jurisdiction over such land. The respondents, including NHAI and state revenue authorities, opposed the petition, stating that a declaration under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956 had been made, vesting the land absolutely with NHAI. The revenue authorities conducted a demarcation and confirmed the encroachment. The court, after hearing arguments, held that once a declaration under Section 3A is made, the land vests with NHAI, and the petitioner's claim of ownership based on 'Grama Natham' classification is not sustainable. The writ petition was dismissed, and the respondents were directed to proceed with eviction in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Vesting of Land - Section 3A of National Highways Act, 1956 - Once a declaration is made under Section 3A, the land absolutely vests with the National Highways Authority of India, and the authority has the right to evict encroachers. The petitioner's claim of ownership based on 'Grama Natham' classification is untenable as the land vests with NHAI. (Paras 1-4)

B) Writ Jurisdiction - Maintainability - Eviction Notice - The writ petition challenging the eviction notice issued by NHAI for encroachment on national highway land is dismissed as the petitioner failed to challenge the declaration under Section 3A and the revenue authorities confirmed the encroachment. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the National Highways Authority of India has jurisdiction to issue eviction notice for land classified as 'Grama Natham' after declaration under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. The respondents are directed to proceed with the eviction of the petitioner from the encroached portion of the national highway land in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Land vests absolutely with NHAI under Section 3A of National Highways Act
  • 1956 upon declaration
  • 'Grama Natham' classification does not confer ownership against NHAI
  • Writ petition not maintainable against eviction notice for encroachment on national highway land
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:MHC:1673

WP No. 13278 of 2025 and WMP No. 14860 of 2025

2026-04-28

S. M. Subramaniam, K. Surender

2026:MHC:1673

Mr.S.Mohamed Uduman, Mrs.S.R.Sumathy, Mr.T.Arun Kumar, Mr.Babu Muthu Meeran

S. Muruganandham

The Highways And Administrative Officer, The Project Director, The Tahsildar, The Assistant Commissioner Of Police, The Inspector Of Police

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging eviction notice issued by NHAI for alleged encroachment on national highway land.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the proceeding dated 02.04.2025 issued by the 1st respondent and a direction to restrain respondents from interfering with his possession of the property.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed ownership of the property classified as 'Grama Natham' and argued that NHAI had no jurisdiction to issue eviction notice.

Issues

Whether NHAI has jurisdiction to issue eviction notice for land classified as 'Grama Natham' after declaration under Section 3A of National Highways Act, 1956.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the land is 'Grama Natham' and neither the State nor NHAI has authority over it, and the order impugned is without jurisdiction. Respondents argued that declaration under Section 3A vests land absolutely with NHAI, and the eviction notice is valid; revenue authorities confirmed encroachment.

Ratio Decidendi

Once a declaration is made under Section 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956, the land absolutely vests with the National Highways Authority of India, and the authority has the right to evict encroachers. The petitioner's claim of ownership based on 'Grama Natham' classification is untenable as the land vests with NHAI.

Judgment Excerpts

The proceedings of the National Highways Authority of India dated 02.04.2024 asking the petitioner to vacate the encroached portion of the National Highways land is under challenge in the present writ proceedings. Once a declaration is made, the land absolutely vests with the National Highways Authority of India.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed WP No. 13278 of 2025 challenging the eviction notice dated 02.04.2025 issued by NHAI. The court heard arguments from both sides and dismissed the petition on 28.04.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • National Highways Act, 1956: Section 3A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Directs Consideration of Quarrying Lease Application Under Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 — Application Rendered Ineligible Under Rule 8-B(1) but Must Be Examined Under Rule 8-B(2) in Light of Earlier Judgment. Writ of ma...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses RTI Petition Seeking GST Returns of Third Parties — Information Denied as Personal and Confidential Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005. The court held that GST returns filed by firms are personal information relating...