Search Results for "statutory protection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "statutory protection"

4145 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4145 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Answers Referred Questions on Adequacy of Protection Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act and Grant of Interim Injunctions. The Court Examined Whether Section 52 TP Act Provides Sufficient Safeguard to Deny Injunction Pendente Lite and the Role of Notice Registration Under Section 18 of the Indian Registration Act.

4 Oct 2016

The appeal arose from an order of the Trial Court rejecting the appellant's application for temporary injunction in a suit for specific performance of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Protective Order in Anticipatory Bail Dismissal - No Power to Grant Protection After Rejection Under Section 438 CrPC. The Court held that once anticipatory bail is rejected, the High Court cannot grant any protection from arrest as the proviso to Section 438(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 explicitly permits arrest, and no inherent power exists for such relief.

28 May 2021

The Supreme Court addressed criminal appeals arising from special leave petitions filed by complainants aggrieved by High Court orders. The background...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court Orders Granting Arrest Protection In Arms Licence Forgery Case -- Investigation To Proceed Without Protection Under IPC And Arms Act

19 Dec 2025

The Supreme Court allowed criminal appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against High Court orders that granted protection from arrest to three ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Applicability of Section 482 CrPC to Domestic Violence Proceedings; Conflicting Precedents on Nature of Proceedings Under Section 12(1) of the D.V. Act Lead to Full Bench. Key Question Involves Whether Inherent Powers of High Court Can Quash D.V. Act Applications Given Their Predominantly Civil Character.

3 May 2018

The matter came before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, as a reference to a Full Bench to resolve conflicting decisions on whether proceedings und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears State of Maharashtra's Appeals Against High Court's Decision Striking Down Section 33A of Bombay Police Act, 1951 as Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The core issue is whether the prohibition of dance performances in eating houses, permit rooms, or beer bars is a reasonable restriction on trade and is within the State's legislative competence.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and others assailing the judgment and order dated 12th April 2006 o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union and State in Consumer Protection Rules Challenge, Reversing High Court's Striking Down of Qualification and Procedure Provisions. Rules 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), and 6(9) of Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of President and Members of State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 Found Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, as They Provide Sufficient Guidelines for Appointments to Consumer Commissions.

3 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Union of India, and State of Maharashtra against a common judgment and order ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.

3 Dec 2015

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against NCDRC Order Holding Interim Moratorium Under IBC Section 96 Does Not Stay Execution of Penalty Orders Under Consumer Protection Act. Consumer Penalties Are Not 'Debt' Under IBC and Execution Proceedings Under Section 27 CP Act Are Criminal in Nature, Not Civil Recovery.

4 Mar 2025

The present appeal was filed against the final judgment and order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), wherein multi...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)