Search Results for "slum rehabilitation area"

238 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 238 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Slum Dweller for Profiteering from Slum Rehabilitation Tenement. Illegal Transfer and Commercial Use of Residential Premises Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 Upheld Eviction.

The petitioner, Rajendra R. Vishwakarma, was a slum dweller who received tenement no. 104 in 'A' wing of New Prabhat Cooperative Housing Society Ltd, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ex-Parte SRA Order Deleting Slum Dweller's Name and Upholds Right to Permanent Alternate Accommodation. Court Held That Supplementary Annexure II Issued Without Hearing Was Invalid, and Petitioner is Entitled to Independent Rehab Tenement Under Slum Rehabilitation Scheme.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Hushna Bano Mohamed Shakir Shaikh challenging an ex-parte order dated 9 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme — Petitioner Failed to Establish Right to Retain Tenement After Ceasing to Be Eligible Slum Dweller.

The petitioner, Harshaben Madhu, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 07/02/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Grant of Scheme to Another Developer. Court upholds SRA's decision based on eligibility criteria and policy, finding no arbitrariness or violation of principles of natural justice.

The Petitioners, Dyna Estate Pvt. Ltd. (a developer) and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Nagar Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha (a proposed cooperative society of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Writ Petition Challenging SRA Eviction Order — Petitioner Lacked Locus Standi as Non-Owner. Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Order to Hand Over Possession to Original Slum Dwellers Upheld Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Transcon-Sheth Creators Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition in the High Court...