Search Results for "section 18"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "section 18"

89 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pre-Arrest Bail to Appellants in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Land Dispute Allegations Do Not Attract Provisions of Sections 3(1)(w)(i) and 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

9 Apr 2019

The present appeal was filed by Raju @ Rajendra Dashrath Khaire and Mahendra @ Anna Rajendra Khaire against the order of the Sessions Court rejecting ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Allegations of Caste-Based Insults Found to be Vague and Not Made in Public View, Attracting Section 3(1)(w)(i)(ii) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

30 Apr 2019

The present appeal was filed by four appellants against the order of the Sessions Court rejecting their application for pre-arrest bail in Crime No. 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. The court held that the bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act does not apply when no prima facie case is made out, as the complainant was unaware of the accused's caste.

5 Mar 2019

The present appeal was filed by Kedarsingh Dharma Patil and Bablu @ Vinod Subhash Patil against the order of the Sessions Court rejecting their applic...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Nominal Compensation of Rs.1 Set Aside. Market Value of Rs.6,417/sq.m. Awarded with Statutory Benefits Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

5 Feb 2019

The appellant, Sadashiv Madhav Shelke, owned land Survey No.3/27 bearing City Survey No.908 admeasuring 258.18 sq. meters at Shirdi, Maharashtra. The ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Order in Securitisation Application Matter. Maintainability of Appeal Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act Against Interim Orders of Debts Recovery Tribunal Upheld.

27 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Trishul Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Reference Application in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Service of Notice Under Section 12(2). The court permitted the petitioners to amend their reference application to plead that no notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was served, which was relevant to the limitation issue raised by the acquiring body.

4 Jan 2012

The petitioners, owners of lands acquired by the Malegaon Municipal Council (now Corporation), were dissatisfied with the compensation awarded under t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reference Filed Within Limitation and Claimants Not Barred by Section 25 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court upheld the enhanced compensation of Rs.357 per Are for land acquired for a fertilizer plant, rejecting the State's arguments on limitation and bar under unamended Section 25.

21 Jan 2011

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and award dated 6.1.90 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Raigad at Alibag in L.A.R. N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Predeposit Condition for Appeal Against Interlocutory Order Under SARFAESI Act. Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Requires Deposit of 50% of Debt for Any Appeal Under Section 17, Including Interlocutory Orders, and Appellate Tribunal May Reduce to 25%.

16 Nov 2010

The petitioners, M/s Vinay Container Services Pvt. Ltd. and its guarantors, challenged an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land. Court holds that the Reference Court erred in dismissing the reference for default without considering the merits, and remands the matter for fresh adjudication under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

18 Jun 2018

The appellant, Shivaji Pandurang Bansode, filed a first appeal against the judgment and award dated 25-02-2013 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Divis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference Appeal, Sets Aside Dismissal on Limitation Grounds. Reference Filed Within Two Months of Collector's Award Held Within Limitation Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

8 Aug 2018

This appeal arises from the dismissal of Land Acquisition Reference No. 241/1997 (Old LAR No. 338/1992) by the reference court on 01.02.2017 on the gr...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)