Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference Appeal, Sets Aside Dismissal on Limitation Grounds. Reference Filed Within Two Months of Collector's Award Held Within Limitation Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This appeal arises from the dismissal of Land Acquisition Reference No. 241/1997 (Old LAR No. 338/1992) by the reference court on 01.02.2017 on the ground that the reference was not filed within six weeks from the date of the Collector's award. The appellants, original claimants, had their land acquired for a canal project. The Collector passed the award on 30.11.1990, and the claimants filed a reference on 30.01.1991, which was within two months. The reference court dismissed it as barred by limitation. The appellants argued that the reference was within limitation and that the respondents had taken a vague plea of limitation without specifying the starting date. The respondents contended that there is no provision for condonation of delay and that the reference was not filed within six weeks. The High Court examined the facts and found that the award was passed on 30.11.1990 and the reference was filed on 30.01.1991, which is within six weeks. The court noted that the period of limitation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is six weeks from the date of the award if the party was present or represented. Since the reference was filed within that period, the dismissal was erroneous. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the matter to the reference court for fresh consideration on merits.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Limitation for Reference - Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - The period of limitation for filing a reference under Section 18 is six weeks from the date of the Collector's award if the party was present or represented at the time of the award. In this case, the award was passed on 30.11.1990 and the reference was filed on 30.01.1991, i.e., within two months. The court held that the reference was within limitation as the period of six weeks had not expired. The dismissal by the reference court on the ground of limitation was set aside. (Paras 1-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was filed within the period of limitation when the award was passed on 30.11.1990 and the reference was filed on 30.01.1991

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned order dated 01.02.2017 passed by the reference court is set aside. The matter is remanded to the reference court for fresh consideration on merits. Parties to appear before the reference court on 10.09.2018.

Law Points

  • Limitation for reference under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894 starts from date of award if party present or represented
  • reference filed within two months is within six weeks period
  • vague plea of limitation without specifying starting date is insufficient
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (08) 2

First Appeal No. 1229 of 2017

2018-08-08

A. M. Dhavale

Mr Mahesh P. Kale for appellants, Mr A. P. Basarkar, AGP for respondent/State

Vinayak Rajeshwarrao Deshpande and others

The State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of land acquisition reference on ground of limitation

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought setting aside of dismissal order and remand for fresh consideration

Filing Reason

Reference court dismissed the reference as barred by limitation, holding it was not filed within six weeks from Collector's award

Previous Decisions

Reference court dismissed LAR No. 338/1992 (New LAR No. 241/1997) on 01.02.2017 on limitation ground

Issues

Whether the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was filed within the period of limitation

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that award was on 30.11.1990 and reference on 30.01.1991, within two months, and respondents took vague plea of limitation Respondents argued that reference was not filed within six weeks and there is no provision for condonation of delay

Ratio Decidendi

The period of limitation for filing a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is six weeks from the date of the Collector's award if the party was present or represented. In this case, the award was passed on 30.11.1990 and the reference was filed on 30.01.1991, which is within six weeks. Therefore, the reference was within limitation and the dismissal was erroneous.

Judgment Excerpts

The award in this matter was delivered on 30.11.1990 and the reference was filed on 30.01.1991 i.e. within a period of two months. If the party was present at the time of Collector's award or was represented before the Collector when he made the award, the period of limitation will start from the date of passing the award

Procedural History

Collector passed award on 30.11.1990. Claimants filed reference on 30.01.1991. Reference court dismissed LAR No. 338/1992 (New LAR No. 241/1997) on 01.02.2017 on limitation ground. Claimants filed First Appeal No. 1229 of 2017 before High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference Appeal, Sets Aside Dismissal on Limitation Grounds. Reference Filed Within Two Months of Collector's Award Held Within Limitation Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Orders for Smuggling of Red Sanders/Sandalwood — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives and Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as detaining ...