WRIT PETITION NO. 5539 OF 2017
5 Feb 2019The petitioner, M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the Bombay High Court...
Search Results for "revision under Article 227"
1311 result(s) found
Found 1311 result(s)
High Court
Full Bench of Bombay High Court Determines Reference on Maintainability of Section 18 Reference Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After 2013 Act Came into Force. Key Issue Involves Whether Landowners Can Seek Enhancement Under Old Act When Award Passed After Commencement of 2013 Act.
7 Aug 2019Background: The matter arose from a land acquisition proceeding initiated by the Pune Municipal Corporation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. A no...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Forum for Trial in SEBI Act Cases — Retrospective Application of 2002 and 2014 Amendments Disputed. Court Considers Whether Change from Magistrate to Sessions Court and Subsequent Special Courts Affects Pre‑2002 Offences Still Pending.
1 Jan 1970This batch of appeals and petitions before the Supreme Court concerned the proper forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange Board ...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in FERA Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Opportunity Notice and Violation of Speedy Trial. The Court quashed criminal complaints and summoning orders against Standard Chartered Bank and its officer for offences under FERA, holding that the proviso to Section 61(2) of FERA requires a mandatory opportunity notice before prosecution, and that inordinate delay of over 20 years violated Article 21.
21 Jul 2026The case involves appeals by Standard Chartered Bank and its officer against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, which declined to quash two crimin...
- 69
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal Order in Mundkar Dispute — Tribunal Exceeded Revisionary Jurisdiction Under Section 26 of Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. Concurrent Findings of Fact by Mamlatdar and Collector Cannot Be Reversed Without Perversity.
9 Oct 2018The petitioners, legal representatives of the original petitioner Mrs. Antoneta Fernandes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con...
- 127
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Rent Control Vacancy Dispute — Revision Against Vacancy Order Held Maintainable Despite Earlier Writ Dismissal. The Court held that an order notifying vacancy is only a step in the process of allotment and can be challenged along with the final order under Section 18 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972.
1 Jan 2020The appeal arises from a rent control dispute concerning House No.61/8, Ground Floor, Green Pasture View, Landhour Bazar, Mussoorie. Rashid Ahmed was ...
- 298
High Court
Karnataka High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Plaintiff to Adduce Evidence in Commercial Suit, Finding No Perversity or Jurisdictional Error. Order Passed Under Order 18 Rule 4(1B) CPC Not Violative of Embargo When Sufficient Cause Shown.
11 Sep 2023The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit (Commercial O.S. No. 1/2018) filed by a Class-I contractor before the Commercial Court at Raichur aga...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit for Declaration Regarding Cheque Security — Revisional Court's Order Rejecting Plaint Restored. The court held that a suit seeking declaration that a cheque was handed over as security is barred under Section 41 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and lacks cause of action, warranting rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
21 Mar 2022The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by defendant no.1, M/s Frost International Limited, against the order of the Orissa High Court which had se...
- 137
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Judgment That Struck Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Notifications Under Environment (Protection) Act. Review Petition Seeks Recall Citing Overlooked Binding Precedents.
1 Jan 1970Background: The present matter is a review petition arising from the Supreme Court's judgment in Vanashakti v. Union of India, dated 16 May 2025, whic...
- 51
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Input Tax Credit Under KVAT Act. Interpretation of Section 10(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Availment of Input Tax Credit Irrespective of Invoice Month Framed the Core Issue.
10 Jan 2018A batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed by various companies including...
- 39
