Search Results for "refund cheque"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "refund cheque"

229 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 229 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Berth Reservation Agreement — Restores Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2026

The appellant, M/s.X-Press Container Lines (UK) Ltd., entered into a Berth Reservation Agreement with the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Por...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Official Assignee to Sell Insolvent's Property in Insolvency Proceedings — Property Not Subject to Prior Agreement of Sale as No Valid Contract Existed. The court held that the Official Assignee has the power to sell the insolvent's property free from an alleged agreement of sale that was not valid or enforceable under the Presidency Town Insolvency Act, 1909.

27 Feb 2026

The case involves an appeal filed by the Official Assignee of the High Court of Madras, representing the estate of Arjunlal Sunderdas (the insolvent),...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Official Assignee to Sell Insolvent's Property in Insolvency Proceedings — Property Not Subject to Attachment Under Section 60 CPC as It Was Not in Possession of Insolvent at Time of Adjudication. The Court held that upon adjudication, all property of the insolvent vests in the Official Assignee under Section 28(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, and attachment before judgment does not prevent such vesting.

27 Feb 2026

The case arises from insolvency proceedings against Arjunlal Sunderdas (the insolvent). The Official Assignee, representing the estate of the insolven...

High Court

High Court Partially Allows Criminal Petition Under Section 482 CrPC in NI Act Case - Quashes Proceedings Against Company Under IBC Moratorium But Continues Against Directors. Court Held That Moratorium Under Section 14 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Bars Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Against Corporate Debtor, But Directors Remain Liable Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Natural Persons.

10 Feb 2026

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by petitioners who ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Refund Order in Unfair Trade Practice Case, Denies Specific Performance. Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld Due to Buyer's Default Under Clause 10 of Plot Buyer's Agreement.

7 Mar 2019

The appellant, Sudha Gupta, filed an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002 read with Section 55 of the repealed Monopolies and Restric...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Examination of Complainant Partner. Failure to Prove Legal Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Presumption Under Section 139 Stands Rebutted.

2 Apr 2014

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by M/s Reshmi Constructions, a partnership firm, against the acquittal of Laxman Vithal Chunek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Customs to Refund Sale Proceeds with Interest Following Settlement Commission Order. Failure to Implement Settlement Order Within Reasonable Time Amounts to Unjust Enrichment and Arbitrary Action Under Article 226.

3 Apr 2013

The Petitioner, Vishnu M. Harlalka, approached the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking implementation of an order dated 9 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Development Agreement in Favor of Purchasers. Agreement for Development Treated as Agreement for Sale Under Specific Relief Act, 1963 as Essential Terms Constitute Sale of Immovable Property.

18 Jul 2012

The appellants, original defendants, were the owners of a property in Pune. They executed a development agreement dated 18th October 2007 in favor of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Electricity Board's Petition Challenging Injunction Against Disconnection for Non-Payment of Arrears. Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Used to Restrain Disconnection Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

22 Dec 2006

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (now Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.), challenged an order passed by the Civil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Contract Dispute Over Advance Payment Recovery — Defendants Liable to Refund Balance Advance After Failure to Deliver Goods. The court upheld the trial court's decree for refund of advance payments with interest, finding breach of contract by the defendants.

28 Apr 2005

The plaintiff, M/s. Sync Overseas Marketing Pvt. Ltd., placed an order with the defendants, M/s. Girivijay Enterprises & ors., on 14th October 1995 fo...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)