Madras High Court Allows Official Assignee to Sell Insolvent's Property in Insolvency Proceedings — Property Not Subject to Attachment Under Section 60 CPC as It Was Not in Possession of Insolvent at Time of Adjudication. The Court held that upon adjudication, all property of the insolvent vests in the Official Assignee under Section 28(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, and attachment before judgment does not prevent such vesting.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from insolvency proceedings against Arjunlal Sunderdas (the insolvent). The Official Assignee, representing the estate of the insolvent, filed an appeal against a judgment and decree dated 01.09.2023 in C.S.No.285 of 2014 passed by a learned Single Judge. The appeal was filed under Order XXVI Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent. The Official Assignee also filed applications (IP Nos.345 to 348 of 2015) seeking directions to advocates Nirmal Cariappa and K.Jacob George to hand over original title deeds of a property at Door No.33, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai, and for permission to sell the property by public auction. The property was the subject matter of a suit for specific performance filed by B.V.Reddy Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (the plaintiff/1st respondent) against the insolvent and others. In that suit, an attachment before judgment was ordered. The insolvent was adjudicated insolvent on 19.12.2014. The Official Assignee contended that upon adjudication, all properties of the insolvent vested in him under Section 28(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, including the attached property. The learned Single Judge had dismissed the Official Assignee's applications, holding that the property did not vest in him because it was not in the possession of the insolvent at the time of adjudication. The Division Bench reversed this decision. The Court held that under Section 28(2), all property of the insolvent vests in the Official Assignee, regardless of possession. The attachment before judgment does not prevent vesting; it only prohibits alienation. The Court directed the advocates to hand over the title deeds to the Official Assignee and permitted the Official Assignee to sell the property, with the sale proceeds to be applied to the claims of creditors, subject to the rights of the attaching creditor. The appeal and applications were allowed.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Vesting of Property - Section 28(2) Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Upon adjudication as insolvent, all property of the insolvent, including property which he may acquire before discharge, vests in the Official Assignee - The property in question, though subject to an attachment before judgment in a suit for specific performance, was not in the possession of the insolvent at the time of adjudication, but the title deeds were with advocates - Held that the property vested in the Official Assignee and the attachment did not prevent vesting (Paras 10-15).

B) Insolvency Law - Sale of Property by Official Assignee - Sections 7, 18(1), 58, 68(1)(a) Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - The Official Assignee sought permission to sell the property for the benefit of creditors - The Court held that the Official Assignee is entitled to sell the property as it vested in him, and the sale proceeds would be subject to the rights of the attaching creditor if any (Paras 16-20).

C) Civil Procedure Code - Attachment before Judgment - Section 60 CPC - Property attached before judgment does not cease to be the property of the judgment-debtor; it remains his property and can vest in the Official Assignee upon insolvency - The attachment only prevents alienation but does not affect the title (Paras 12-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the property at Door No.33, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai, which was the subject matter of a suit for specific performance and an attachment before judgment, vested in the Official Assignee upon adjudication of the insolvent, and whether the Official Assignee is entitled to sell the property for distribution among creditors.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal (OSA.No.187 of 2023) is allowed, setting aside the judgment and decree dated 01.09.2023 in C.S.No.285 of 2014. The applications (IP Nos.345 to 348 of 2015) are allowed. The advocates Nirmal Cariappa and K.Jacob George are directed to hand over the original title deeds of the property to the Official Assignee. The Official Assignee is permitted to sell the property by public auction and apply the sale proceeds to the claims of the general body of creditors, subject to the rights of the attaching creditor, if any.

Law Points

  • Insolvency
  • Property vesting in Official Assignee
  • Section 28(2) Presidency Towns Insolvency Act
  • 1909
  • Section 60 CPC
  • Attachment before judgment
  • Benami transaction
  • Possession
  • Title deeds
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:MHC:845

OSA.No. 187 of 2023 and C.M.P.No. 22006 of 2023 and C.M.P.Nos. 22184 and 22187 of 2024 and Application (IP) Nos. 345 to 348 of 2015 in I.P.No. 25 of 2014

2026-02-27

C.V.Karthikeyan, K.Kumaresh Babu

2026:MHC:845

Mr. K.V.Ananthakrushnan assisted by Ms.A.Janani for appellant; Ms. Chitra Sampath, Senior Counsel for Mr.Mukundan for 1st respondent

The Official Assignee, High Court, Chennai, Representing the Estate of Arjunlal Sunderdas (Insolvent)

1. B.V.Reddy Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., 2. Mr.s.Murali Mani, 3. Mr.S.Balan Mani, 4. Mr.Arjunlal Sunderdas, 5. S.M.Lal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment in a civil suit and applications in insolvency proceedings seeking directions to hand over title deeds and permission to sell property.

Remedy Sought

The Official Assignee sought to have the property at Door No.33, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai, vested in him and to sell it for the benefit of creditors.

Filing Reason

The Official Assignee claimed that upon adjudication of Arjunlal Sunderdas as insolvent, the property vested in him under Section 28(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, and he needed to sell it to distribute proceeds among creditors.

Previous Decisions

The learned Single Judge dismissed the Official Assignee's applications, holding that the property did not vest in him as it was not in the possession of the insolvent at the time of adjudication.

Issues

Whether the property at Door No.33, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai, vested in the Official Assignee upon adjudication of the insolvent under Section 28(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909? Whether the attachment before judgment in the suit for specific performance prevented the vesting of the property in the Official Assignee? Whether the Official Assignee is entitled to sell the property for distribution among creditors?

Submissions/Arguments

The Official Assignee argued that under Section 28(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, all property of the insolvent vests in him, and the attachment before judgment does not affect vesting. The 1st respondent (plaintiff in the suit) argued that the property was not in the possession of the insolvent at the time of adjudication and therefore did not vest in the Official Assignee.

Ratio Decidendi

Upon adjudication as insolvent, all property of the insolvent vests in the Official Assignee under Section 28(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, regardless of possession. An attachment before judgment does not prevent such vesting; it only prohibits alienation. The Official Assignee is entitled to sell the property for the benefit of creditors, subject to the rights of the attaching creditor.

Judgment Excerpts

Under Section 28(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, upon adjudication, all property of the insolvent vests in the Official Assignee. The attachment before judgment does not prevent the vesting of the property in the Official Assignee. The Official Assignee is entitled to sell the property and distribute the proceeds among the creditors.

Procedural History

The suit C.S.No.285 of 2014 was filed by B.V.Reddy Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. for specific performance. An attachment before judgment was ordered. The defendant Arjunlal Sunderdas was adjudicated insolvent on 19.12.2014 in I.P.No.25 of 2014. The Official Assignee filed applications IP Nos.345 to 348 of 2015 seeking directions to hand over title deeds and permission to sell the property. The learned Single Judge dismissed the applications on 01.09.2023. The Official Assignee filed OSA.No.187 of 2023 against that judgment and also filed the applications. The Division Bench heard the appeal and applications together and allowed them on 27.02.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909: 7, 18(1), 28(2), 58, 68(1)(a)
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 60
  • Insolvency Rules, 1958: Order II Rule 1, Order XIV Rule 2 and 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Official Assignee to Sell Insolvent's Property in Insolvency Proceedings — Property Not Subject to Attachment Under Section 60 CPC as It Was Not in Possession of Insolvent at Time of Adjudication. The Court held that upon a...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion for Determination of Priority of Claims Against Sale Proceeds of Arrested Vessel in Admiralty Suit. The court directed that the order of priority of claims against the sale proceeds shall be determined afte...