Search Results for "ransom demand"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act. Search Conducted Without Informing Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, Rendering Recovery Illegal.

The applicant, Dhanji Dubriya, filed a bail application under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) in connection with F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Delay in Filing FIR. Court Held That Absence of Grievous Injuries and Delay in FIR Weakened Prosecution Case Under Sections 140(2), 308(7), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

The applicants, Ankush Singh and Jatin Patel, filed a bail application under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 0039 of 202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Applicants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Court held that Section 308(7) BNS requires specific intent to cause death, which was absent as injuries were simple and on non-vital parts.

The applicants, Vikas Rajput and Dilip Gavit, filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking release in c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Appeal of Convicted Person Against Conviction under Sections 364A and 386 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Appeal Challenges Life Imprisonment and Rigorous Imprisonment for Kidnapping for Ransom and Extortion.

The appeal was filed by the appellant Javed Akhtar Basiulla Ansari against his conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Thane in Sessions Case N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand for ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Raju @ Rakesh Dhaniram Patel, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for offences punishable under Section 364-A (kidna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 363, 365 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that appellant shared common intention with co-accused to kidnap the minor victim.

The appellant, Salim Abbas Chaudhari, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 363 and 365 read with Section 34 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 364A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand for ransom and threat beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the kidnapping of a minor boy, Sumit, son of Shantaram Kumbhar (PW1), on 18th November 2002. The prosecution alleged that the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Including Last Seen Evidence and Recovery of Articles Proved Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 364, 302, 201, 386 IPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, convicting the appellants for offences und...