Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Delay in Filing FIR. Court Held That Absence of Grievous Injuries and Delay in FIR Weakened Prosecution Case Under Sections 140(2), 308(7), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 73
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, Ankush Singh and Jatin Patel, filed a bail application under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 0039 of 2025 registered at Coastal Police Station, Kadaiya, Daman, for offences under Sections 140(2), 308(7), and 3(5) BNS. The FIR was lodged on 26th August 2025, alleging that the applicants, along with others, attacked the complainant with weapons, causing injuries. The police filed a final report on 17th October 2025. The applicants argued that the FIR was delayed, the injuries were not grievous, and there was no prima facie case against them. The respondent, Union Territory of Daman & Diu, opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The court, after considering the submissions and evidence, noted that the medical reports did not show grievous injuries, the FIR was filed after a delay, and no specific overt acts were attributed to the applicants. The court held that continued detention was not justified and granted bail to both applicants on certain conditions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Bail - Prima Facie Case - Sections 140(2), 308(7), 3(5) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Applicants sought bail for alleged attempt to murder and rioting - Court held that absence of grievous injuries, delay in FIR, and lack of specific overt acts justified bail - Held that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, and continued detention not warranted (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicants are entitled to bail under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, considering the nature of allegations, evidence, and delay in lodging the FIR.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Bail granted to both applicants on conditions.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Prima Facie Case
  • Delay in FIR
  • Section 140(2) BNS
  • Section 308(7) BNS
  • Section 3(5) BNS
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-AS:55439

Bail Application No. 4499 of 2025

2025-12-16

Dr. Neela Gokhale, J.

2025:BHC-AS:55439

Mr. Vivek Pandey a/w Mr. Afsar Ansari for Applicants; Mr. Ashwin Thool a/w Mr. Ayush Singh a/w Archishmati Chandramore for Respondent No.1 (U.T.); Mr. Shreyas Uday Lalit a/w Mr. Varun Thokal a/w Mr. Aditya Singh i/b. Mr. Varun Thokal for Respondent No.4 / Intervenor.

Ankush Singh and Jatin Patel

Union Territory of Daman & Diu and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Bail application in criminal case

Remedy Sought

Release on bail by the applicants

Filing Reason

Allegations of attempt to murder and rioting under BNS

Issues

Whether the applicants have made out a case for bail under the BNS? Whether the delay in filing FIR and lack of grievous injuries weaken the prosecution case?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that FIR was delayed, injuries not grievous, no prima facie case. Respondent argued that offences are serious and bail should be denied.

Ratio Decidendi

Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; absence of prima facie evidence and delay in FIR justify grant of bail.

Judgment Excerpts

The Applicants seek their release on bail in connection with FIR No. 0039 of 2025... The Police filed the Final Report No. 37 of 2025, before the JMFC, Daman, on 17th October 2025.

Procedural History

FIR registered on 26th August 2025; Final Report filed on 17th October 2025; Bail application filed thereafter.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: 140(2), 308(7), 3(5)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition in EGS Termination Case. Project-Based Employment Under Employment Guarantee Scheme Does Not Confer Right to Regularisation Despite Completion of 240 Days.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Delay in Filing FIR. Court Held That Absence of Grievous Injuries and Delay in FIR Weakened Prosecution Case Under Sections 140(2), 308(7), 3(5...