High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Appeal of Convicted Person Against Conviction under Sections 364A and 386 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Appeal Challenges Life Imprisonment and Rigorous Imprisonment for Kidnapping for Ransom and Extortion.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the appellant Javed Akhtar Basiulla Ansari against his conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Thane in Sessions Case No. 248 of 2014 on 7 February 2017. The appellant was convicted under Sections 364A and 386 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. He was sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1000 under Section 364A, and to rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs. 500 under Section 386. The trial court acquitted him of offences under Section 25(1)(c)(1-a) of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 37(1)135 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 due to lack of sanction/prosecution evidence. The appeal was heard by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay comprising Justice Revati Mohite Dere and Justice Dr. Neela Gokhale. The judgment was reserved on 23 April 2025 and pronounced on 30 April 2025. The appellant was represented by Mr. B. A. Lawate and the State by APP Mr. Ashish I. Satpute. The outcome of the appeal is not mentioned in the available text.

Issue of Consideration

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 296 OF 2017

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 68

Criminal Appeal No. 296 of 2017 with Interim Application No. 5098 of 2024

2025-04-30

Revati Mohite Dere, Dr. Neela Gokhale

2025:BHC-AS:19705-DB

B. A. Lawate, Ashish I. Satpute

Javed Akhtar Basiulla Ansari

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal challenging conviction for kidnapping for ransom and extortion.

Remedy Sought

The appellant seeks to set aside the conviction and sentence passed by the trial court.

Filing Reason

The appellant was convicted and sentenced by the Sessions Court, prompting the appeal.

Previous Decisions

The Additional Sessions Judge-3, Thane convicted the appellant in Sessions Case No. 248 of 2014 on 7 February 2017 under Sections 364A and 386 IPC and acquitted him under Arms Act and Bombay Police Act charges.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Sections 364A and 386 IPC is sustainable. Whether the acquittal under Arms Act and Bombay Police Act was proper due to lack of sanction.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant assails the Judgment and Order dated 7th February 2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Thane in Sessions Case No.248 of 2014.

Procedural History

The case was investigated by Bhiwandi City Police Station vide C.R.No.I-232 of 2013. The appellant was tried in Sessions Case No. 248 of 2014 before the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Thane, who convicted him on 7 February 2017. The appeal was filed before the High Court as Criminal Appeal No. 296 of 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 364A, 386
  • Arms Act, 1959: 25(1)(c)(1-a)
  • Bombay Police Act, 1951: 37(1)135
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Appeal of Convicted Person Against Conviction under Sections 364A and 386 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Appeal Challenges Life Imprisonment and Rigorous Imprisonment for Kidnapping for Ransom and E...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case for Possession of LSD and Charas Below Commercial Quantity. Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Not Attracted as Recovered Quantity Was Less Than Commercial Quantity.