Search Results for "promotion deferred"

109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010102062008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Medically Invalidated CRPF Constable in Service Law Case — Employer Must Consider Alternative Employment Before Medical Invalidation. Medical Invalidation Without Exploring Alternative Post Violates Right to Livelihood Under Article 21 of Constitution.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India and CRPF officers against the High Court of Himachal Pradesh's order reinstating a constable (driver...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compassionate Appointment Order Due to Non-Existent Vacancy and Lack of Statutory Scheme. Director's Approval for Appointment of Widow as Peon Set Aside as No Vacancy Existed and No Compensatory Appointment Policy Governed Aided Colleges.

The petitioners, Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Karmaveer Mahavidyalaya, Mul, challenged an order dated 7.3.2007 passed by the Director of Higher Educat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal of Territorial Army Officer for Reconsideration of Promotion Grading. COAS directed to reconsider appellant's 'Z' grading in June 2001 Selection Board, as similar reconsideration was granted to another officer.

The appellant, Lt. Col. NK Ghai (Retd.), was commissioned into the Territorial Army on 14 March 1978 and promoted to Selection Grade Lieutenant Colone...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Arising from Cadre Bifurcation and Re-amalgamation in Customs and Excise Department. Dispute Centers on Impact of Separate Data Processing Cadre on Ministerial Employee Seniority Under the 1979 Recruitment Rules.

The case involved a seniority dispute among employees of the Customs and Central Excise Department. The original ministerial cadre, governed by the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discriminatory Sales Tax Rules Under Article 226. Held that Rule 31B and Rule 31AA of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 operate in different contexts and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, M/s Graphite India Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High C...