Search Results for "patent illegality"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "patent illegality"

1383 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1383 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Leave and Licence Dispute — Liquidated Damages Upheld for Early Termination During Lock-in Period. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of the lock-in clause and award of liquidated damages was not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Globsport India Private Limited, challenged an arbitral award dated 28 January 2012 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliati...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Insurance Claim Dispute — Underinsurance Calculation Upheld as Not Perverse. Court finds no patent illegality in tribunal's assessment of 55% underinsurance on replacement value basis.

9 Mar 2015

The petitioner, M/s Lift and Shift India Pvt. Ltd., imported a second-hand crawler crane in 2004 and insured it with the respondent, M/s Iffco Tokio G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Sale-Cum-Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2015

The petitioner, MSRT Corporation, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

10 Feb 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in False Ceiling Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award on Certain Claims but Sets Aside Award on Claim for Price Escalation Due to Lack of Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms.

13 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), challenged an arbitral award dated 29 March 2011 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Software Development Disputes — No Patent Illegality or Perversity Found. Court upholds awards under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no grounds for interference with arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum.

16 Jan 2015

The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging separate arbitral aw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Rejection of Specific Performance and Damages in Development Agreement Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitrator's Findings on Non-Compliance with Conditions Precedent and Lack of Proof of Damages Are Not Patently Illegal.

9 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Om Shiv Constructions, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Set Aside for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's rejection of the counterclaim without considering evidence and without granting an opportunity to be heard amounted to a patent illegality and breach of natural justice.

17 Dec 2025

The case involves an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Reliance Naval and Engineering Ltd....

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Specific Performance of Development Agreement — Failure to Consider Limitation and Lack of Evidence of Agreement. Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenge succeeds as award based on letter dated November 4, 2003 read with unregistered document suffers from patent illegality and perversity.

12 Dec 2025

The Bombay High Court set aside an arbitral award dated August 5, 2017, which had granted specific performance of a development agreement in favor of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Found to Be in Conflict with Public Policy Due to Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of the contract was perverse and contrary to the terms of the agreement, warranting interference under Section 34.

25 Nov 2025

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Kotak Securities Limited (the petitioner) challenging...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)