Search Results for "original cash advance"

442 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 442 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Against Decree for Specific Performance — Trial Court Decree Granting Specific Performance and Cancellation of Sale Deed Under Challenge. The Court Reserved Judgment; Outcome Not Stated in This Excerpt.

These two regular first appeals arose from the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2015 in O.S.No.594/2005 passed by the XI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Failure to Repay Loan Does Not Constitute Cheating Under Section 420 IPC When Transaction is Essentially a Civil Debt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Radheshyam Motilal Rungta (respondent/accused) by the Sessions Court, which had reversed hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.388 OF 2016

The petitioners, a company importing and supplying ATMs to State Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Legally Enforceable Debt. Agreement to Sell Not Signed by Accused, No Privity of Contract Established Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Shaikh Suleman Shaikh Rustam, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Money Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Appellant failed to establish substantial question of law regarding loan transaction and repayment.

The appellant, Sri M M Deverajgowda, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Guarantor's Appeal in Bank Recovery Suit — Guarantee Not Limited to Three Years, Liability Joint and Several. The court held that the guarantor failed to prove the alleged limitation of three years and is jointly and severally liable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The case involves a first appeal filed by Padmakar Krushnarao Bhagwatkar, who was the guarantor/defendant No.2 in a suit filed by the State Bank of In...