Search Results for "objectors hearing"

165 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Allows Cross-Objection for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, No Contributory Negligence by Deceased, and Claimants Entitled to Higher Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 18.06.2015 at about 9.30 p.m. near Jafarwadi village, Belagavi. The deceased, one Manjunath, wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Bridge Construction — Upholds Section 5A Report and Section 6 Declaration. Petitioners' Objections Regarding Residential Structures Rejected as Acquisition Was for Public Purpose and Due Process Followed.

The petitioners, owners of land in Sanguem, Goa, challenged the acquisition of their property for construction of a parallel bridge. They purchased po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Execution Objection Case — Third Party Objectors Entitled to Hearing Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Court holds that objections by third parties claiming ownership of property in execution must be adjudicated on merits, not summarily rejected.

The case arises from execution proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No. 8 of 1995, where the trial court passed a decree on 27.08.1999 in favor of the pl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Declaration for Sugar Factory Due to Non-Compliance with Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Collector Failed to Prepare Independent Report or Submit Recommendations, Relying Instead on Beneficiary's Chart, Rendering Section 6 Declaration Invalid.

The petitioners, Sukumar M. Khot and others, challenged a declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, published on 23 June 2005, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Construction Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' Challenge to Notification Under Section 4 and Declaration Under Section 6 Fails as Court Finds No Violation of Statutory Requirements or Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, residents of Pernem, Goa, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land for the construction of a road by the State...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Legality of Land Acquisition for Jaipur Metro Rail Phase II, Focusing on Compliance with Section 5A Hearing. The Court Examined Whether Denial of Personal Hearing to Landowners Vitiates Acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court heard civil appeals by landowners challenging a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that reversed a Single Judge's o...