Search Results for "mis-statement"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Entry and Notice Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Petitioner directed to approach Deputy Commissioner under Section 136 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Smt. Rajeshwari W/o. Muttanna Biraj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Penalty on Company Officials Under CGST Act Due to Lack of Personal Liability Evidence and Procedural Flaws. Petitioners Challenge Penalty Order for Fake Input Tax Credit Allegations

The petitioners, employees of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order-in-original dated 1 February 2025 that i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice in GST Input Tax Credit Dispute — Misinterpretation of Section 17(5)(d) of CGST Act, 2017. Transfer of Leasehold Rights of Industrial Plots Held Not to Be 'Construction of Immovable Property' for ITC Reversal.

The petitioner, Niket Bipinbhai Patel, through his power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging a show-ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeals of Travel Agencies in Service Tax Export Case — Services Rendered to Foreign Clients Abroad Constitute Export of Service Under Finance Act, 1994. Extended Period of Limitation Under Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994 Cannot Be Invoked Without Suppression or Fraud.

The Madras High Court allowed two appeals filed by M/s. Translanka Air Travels Pvt Ltd and M/s. ETA Travel Agency Pvt Ltd against orders of the Custom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Unjust Enrichment. Bar of Unjust Enrichment Not Applicable to Provisional Assessment Cases Prior to Amendment of Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III Commissionerate, against the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Ap...