Search Results for "minor defendants"

456 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Appellate Decree for Lack of Evidence on Marriage and Possession. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove the marriage of Muniyappa with Thimmakka and their joint possession, reversing the first appellate court's decree.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents/plaintiffs claiming 13/20th share in the suit property originally purchased by G.B. Muniya...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Relinquishment Deed Executed by Karta in Joint Hindu Family Property Case. Relinquishment deed executed by eldest male member as Karta is valid and binding on minor coparceners, and suit for declaration filed beyond limitation period is barred.

The present appeal arises from a suit filed in 1994 by four younger sons of late M.C. Rudrappa seeking a declaration that a relinquishment deed dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Minor's Property Sale Case — Mother's Sale Without Court Permission Void. Sale of Minor's Share by Mother as De Facto Guardian Without Prior Court Permission Under Section 8 of Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 Held Void Ab Initio.

The appellant, Rameshwar Paul, originally a minor, filed a suit through his father as next friend seeking declaration that a sale deed executed by his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Letters Patent Appeal against decree for possession and mesne profits dismissed as no substantial question of law or perversity found in concurrent findings of fact.

The present Letters Patent Appeal arises from a judgment and decree passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No. 133/1976, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for ANTITHYROX and THYROX Against Defendant's LETHYROX. No deceptive similarity found as prefix 'LE' distinguishes marks and THYROX is descriptive of thyroid treatment.

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a suit against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another for infringement of their registered trad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.

The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...