Search Results for "mineral extraction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "mineral extraction"

133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Orders for Unauthorized Minor Mineral Extraction Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show cause notices and final orders under Section 48(7) and (8) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice.

1 Mar 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Royale Urbanspace and its partners, owned land bearing Survey No.44/1 at Mouje Borsheti, Taluka Shahapur, District Thane. In 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Hears PIL Challenging Goa's 2023 Dump Policy Clause 2(2) Permitting Dump Mining Without Auction or Lease. Petition Also Challenges Approvals Granted to Ex-Lessee Without Auction or Mining Lease, Claiming Violation of MMDR Act 1957 and Constitutional Norms for Resource Disposal.

7 May 2026

The Goa Foundation, an environmental NGO, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging Clause 2(2) of the Policy For Regulating Iron Ore Dump Handli...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction for Illegal Sand Mining Under MMRD Act — Revision Petition Dismissed. Petitioner failed to prove ownership of land or valid license for sand extraction, and courts below correctly applied Section 4(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Rules 3(1) and 42 of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

25 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Parappa S/o Hamappa Lamani, was convicted by the Civil Judge and JMFC, Shiggaon, in C.C.No.497/2013 for the offence punishable under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of Contribution to District Mineral Foundation Under Rule 45(1A) of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 — Rule Held Ultra Vires the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The court quashed demands for DMF contribution as a condition for mineral dispatch, ruling that Rule 45(1A) is beyond the rule-making power under Section 15 of the MMDR Act.

7 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by mining lessees challenging the demand for contribution to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Multiple Interlocutory Applications in Mining Case — Excess Iron Ore Sale Dispute and Lease Area Enhancement Addressed. Court rejects claim for payment of excess iron ore sold by Monitoring Committee due to revised returns filed after suspension of mining, and permits enhancement of mining lease area for auction.

8 May 2024

The Supreme Court disposed of a series of interlocutory applications in a long-pending writ petition concerning iron ore mining in Karnataka. The Cour...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.

1 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Challenge to Royalty Rules Under MMDR Act. Petitioners Argue Notification and Amended Rule 64D Exceed Section 9(3) Powers.

8 May 2013

These writ petitions arose out of challenges by various mining leaseholders in Goa to the notification dated 13 August 2009, the amendment to Rule 64D...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.

4 May 2018

The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Royalty and Penalty Imposed on IKEA for Earth Excavated During Store Development. Earth Excavated and Utilised for Backfilling, Levelling, and Internal Roads on the Same Plot Is Exempt from Royalty Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Read with Rule 46 of the Extraction Rules, 2013.

10 Apr 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by IKEA India Private Limited and its authorised officer, challenging the demand for royalty and p...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)