Search Results for "luxury tax"

44 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Husband's Revision Against Enhanced Maintenance for Wife and Daughter. Enhancement from Rs.6,500 to Rs.14,000 per month upheld as not excessive given husband's income of Rs.25,900 per month under Section 125 CrPC.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the husband, Mayurbhai Badvantbhai Dave, challenging the judgment and order dated 25.09.202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Consent Terms Recording Satisfaction of Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable. Execution of Arbitral Award Governed by Arbitration Act, Not Commercial Courts Act; Appeals Confined to Section 37 of Arbitration Act.

The Bombay High Court dismissed three commercial appeals filed by Usha Kakade, Sanjay Kakade, and Kakade Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies 'Commercial Purpose' Under Consumer Protection Act for Company Purchases for Director Use. The Court held that purchase of a vehicle by a company for personal use of its directors does not amount to commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals concerning the interpretation of 'commercial purpose' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of RERA Order and Grants Interim Relief of Deposit and Injunction Against Developer. RERA Order Directing Refund of Investment with Interest Must Be Complied With by Revenue Authorities and Developer.

The petitioner, Rustam Phiroze Mehta, filed a writ petition seeking enforcement of an order dated 15th April 2019 passed by the Maharashtra Real Estat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused; failure to prove legally enforceable debt not established.

This is an appeal by the complainant against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Disabled Petitioner to Import Car Without Customs Clearance Permit Under Central Government Policy for Physically Handicapped Persons. The court permitted clearance of the modified car under the exemption order, holding that the policy did not require a Customs Clearance Permit.

The petitioner, Kirti M. Kothari, a disabled person suffering from Polio affecting his left arm, imported a car with appropriate modifications under a...