WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022
2 May 2025The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...
Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"
567 result(s) found
Found 567 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Declares Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Due to Non-Compliance with Time Limit. Award Excluding Subject Lands and Subsequent Inaction for Over Two Decades Leads to Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings.
11 Dec 2024The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Laxman Mahadev Katkar, challenged the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Ma...
- 725
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Urban Improvement Trust's Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Proceedings Upheld Despite Delay and Compensation Disputes. Notification under Section 52(1) of Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 Valid; Compensation Determined and Paid Lawfully.
10 Dec 2024The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Urban Improvement Trust against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which had quashed the land...
- 573
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under Resettlement Act — Acquisition Upheld as Possession Vested in Government and Section 48(1) Application Rejected. Court Held That Once Possession Is Taken and Award Is Passed, Government Cannot Withdraw Land From Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
25 Oct 2024The petitioner, Ashok Shantinath Chougule, as legal heir of his deceased father Shantinath Dada Chougule, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...
- 269
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Development Authority in Land Acquisition and Urban Scheme Case Due to Valid Delegation and Implementation. Delegation of Power to Collector Under Section 5-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Was Implicit and Valid, and Scheme Did Not Lapse Under Section 54 of Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973, as Substantial Steps Were Taken Within Three Years.
3 Mar 2023The Supreme Court heard appeals by the Indore Development Authority (IDA) against a common judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court that had quashed ...
- 292
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Award Due to Lapse Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land Acquisition Proceedings Deemed Lapsed as Award Was Not Made Within Two Years of Section 6 Declaration.
16 Dec 2022The petitioner, Haribhau Narayan Chikane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the land acquisition award ...
- 53
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Municipal Corporation's Mandamus for Land Acquisition Due to Lapsed Reservation and Financial Incapacity. Reservation under Development Plan Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966, and Acquisition Not Mandated as Corporation Lacked Funds Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.
14 Feb 2022The dispute involved a land reservation under the Kolhapur development plan sanctioned in 1999 for public purposes like parking and garden. The landow...
- 307
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in MRTP Act Reservation Lapse Case — Purchaser Entitled to Benefit of Prior Owner's Section 49 Notice. Reservation Lapses Under Section 49(7) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 When No Acquisition Within One Year of Purchase Notice, and Benefit Enures to Subsequent Purchaser.
14 Feb 2020The Supreme Court allowed the appeals against the Bombay High Court's order which had disposed of the writ petition filed by the appellants, purchaser...
- 1506
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.
9 Aug 2019The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...
- 257
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.
15 Dec 2016The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...
- 81
