Search Results for "interconnected agreements"

54 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 54 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Court Receiver in Favor of Appellants in Commercial Suits Involving Secured Creditors. Appointment of receiver without notice and without considering secured creditors' rights under SARFAESI Act is unsustainable.

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by Future Corporate Resources Pvt Ltd and Ojas Tradelease And Mall Management Pvt Ltd against or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act to Prevent Payment to Contractor Pending Arbitration — Share Subscription Agreement and Concession Agreement Form Composite Transaction

The petitioner, Welspun Enterprises Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an interim injunc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Arbitrator's rejection of escalation claim due to absence of escalation clause upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, M/s. Gulraj Engineering Construction Co., a registered partnership firm, challenged an arbitral award dated 14 January 2009 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Telecom Billing Dispute — Claim Barred by Section 15 of TRAI Act, 1997. Counterclaim for unpaid bills upheld with 12% interest as petitioner failed to challenge tariff orders before TRAI or Appellate Tribunal.

The petitioner, M/s. Kansan Communications Pvt. Ltd., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ch...