Search Results for "inquiry officer bias"

160 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Police Personnel for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Evidence. Inquiry conducted without proper opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and based on inadmissible evidence held unsustainable.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by police personnel (three police constables and one assistant sub-inspector) challenging disciplinary...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Transfer of Sessions Case Due to Apprehension of Bias from Trial Judge's Remarks. Accused's Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21 of Constitution of India Prevails Over Mere Allegations of Bias.

The petitioners, accused No.1 to 3 in Sessions Case No.164/2019 pending before the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi, filed a pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Setting Aside of Dismissal of Judicial Officers for Non-Recording of Reasons Under Article 311(2)(b). Liberty to Initiate Fresh Proceedings with Proper Reasons Upheld as Valid.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by three judicial officers—Hari Niwas Gupta, Komal Ram, and Jitendra Nath Singh—who were dismissed from s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Illegal Deduction from Retiral Dues — Violation of Natural Justice and Article 300A. Deduction of Rs.3,01,361/- from employee's legal dues without prior notice or opportunity of hearing held arbitrary and violative of constitutional guarantees.

The petitioner, Dev Raj Mehta, was appointed as Chairman-cum-Managing Director of National Textile Corporation (Maharashtra North) Limited from 29.3.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Premature Retirement of Deputy Director of Health Services. The court upheld the constitutional validity of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and found the premature retirement order valid based on adverse entries and public interest.

The petitioner, Dr. Mrs. Pratibha Gulhane, a retired Deputy Director of Health Services, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...