Search Results for "indemnity"

274 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India – Civil Appellate Jurisdiction – Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Limitation Period – Continuing Cause of Action – Error on Face of Record – Substantive Right Over Procedural Technicality – NCDRC Order Quashed and Set Aside.

Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Section 67 – Limitation Period to File Complaint – Continuing Cause of Action Upheld – NCDRC's Dismissal on Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Hospital's Appeal Against NCDRC Order Exonerating Insurer in Medical Negligence Case. Insurance Policies Taken by Doctors Cannot Be Used to Fasten Liability on Insurer for Hospital's Own Negligence.

The appellant, M/s Sheth M L Vaduwala Eye Hospital, a charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1961, conducted an eye camp betwe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Guarantors in SFC Act Recovery Case — Directors Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Company Loan. Guarantors Cannot Raise Defences of Principal Debtor Under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951.

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 19th September 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Civil Petition No.859 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits Winding Up Petition Against Syrma Technology Pvt. Ltd. for Non-Payment of Admitted Debt Despite Insurance Payment. Court holds that receipt of insurance proceeds does not extinguish the debt or bar winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Jiangsu Skyrun Wuxi Co. Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Syrma Tec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Against Collecting Banker in Pay Order Fraud Case. Bank Liable for Conversion Due to Negligence in Collecting Pay Order with Forged Endorsement Under Section 131 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Saraswat Cooperative Bank Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...