Search Results for "in-camera statements"

79 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution. The Court Held That a 19-Day Gap Between Passing and Service of Detention Order Without Explanation Violates the Detenu's Right to Make a Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Vishnu @ Bablu Vasant Gawali, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Lack of Material to Show Harm or Danger. Petitioner's involvement in two theft cases insufficient to justify externment under Section 56 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 as there was no evidence of witnesses unwilling to depose.

The petitioner, Pankaj Prakash Shimpi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the externment proceedings ini...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 57 of Bombay Police Act, 1951. Externment order set aside as authority failed to link incamera statements to gambling offences under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887.

The petitioner, Shri Mallu Tikaram Varma, challenged an externment order dated 19.10.2016 passed under Section 57(1)(a)(v) of the Bombay Police Act, 1...