Search Results for "impleading legal representatives"

126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Impleadment of Proposed Plaintiff in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Order I Rule 10 CPC. Co-ownership Claim Recognized as Sufficient Ground for Impleadment Despite Delay, as No Limitation Applies Under Order I Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, Veeramani, filed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated August 29, 2022 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular First Appeals in Property Suit — Decree of Trial Court Set Aside for Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession Held Not Maintainable Without Impleading All Co-Sharers Under Order 1 Rule 9 of CPC, 1908.

The judgment pertains to two Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Brothers as Legal Representatives in Specific Performance Suit. Definition of 'Legal Representative' Under Section 2(11) CPC Includes Persons Who Intermeddle with Estate or on Whom Estate Devolves, Not Limited to Class I Heirs.

The petitioners, original defendants in Special Civil Suit No. 41 of 2010, challenged the trial court's order dated 01.12.2014 allowing an application...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entry in Property Dispute — Petitioners Failed to Establish Title or Possession. Court Held That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and That Civil Suit Is Appropriate Remedy for Title Disputes.

The judgment pertains to a group of writ petitions filed by members of the Shirole family challenging a mutation entry in the revenue records of a pro...