Search Results for "illegal quarrying"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "illegal quarrying"

49 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 49 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Constitutional Validity of Goa Land Revenue Code Amendment Exempting Stone Crushers from Conversion Permission. Section 30A of the Goa Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act, 2023 is held intra vires Articles 14, 21, 48A, and 51A(g) of the Constitution as it applies to existing lawful units and is a reasonable classification to protect livelihoods and prevent economic disruption.

1 Oct 2025

The petitioners, residents of Sao Jose De Areal, Goa, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 30A insert...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Complaint Against Directors in Punjab Land Preservation Act Case — No Offence Disclosed on Plain Reading of Complaint. The Court held that a complaint under Section 4 of the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 must specify which clause of Section 4 is violated, and vague allegations without material particulars do not constitute a prima facie case.

6 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had refused to quash a criminal complaint under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute — Lack of Notice to Original Landowner Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Deemed Conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA cannot be granted without affording opportunity of hearing to the developer who is not a member of the society.

4 Oct 2023

The petitioners, M/s. K.G. Associates (developer) and its partner, challenged an order dated 17 March 2020 passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Orders for Unauthorized Minor Mineral Extraction Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show cause notices and final orders under Section 48(7) and (8) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice.

1 Mar 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Royale Urbanspace and its partners, owned land bearing Survey No.44/1 at Mouje Borsheti, Taluka Shahapur, District Thane. In 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Demolition of Commercial Structures in Protected Area of Virupapura Gaddi, Hampi. Constructions in Protected Area Declared Under Mysore Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1961 Are Illegal and Subject to Demolition by Hampi World Heritage Area Management Authority.

11 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by owners of restaurants, guest houses, and other commercial establishments in Virupapura Gaddi, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Illegal Sand Mining Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under MMDR Act. Petitioner/Accused No.1 Charged Under Section 379 IPC and Sections 21, 22 of MMDR Act for Alleged Theft of Sand – Proceedings Quashed as Cognizance Without Required Sanction Under Section 22 of MMDR Act is Invalid.

16 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Shri Rudrappa, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against ASI Officials for Alleged Violation of Judgment on Jantar Mantar Protection. No Willful Disobedience Found as Construction Predated Notification and ASI Took Remedial Steps.

9 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed a contempt petition filed by Shiv Darshan Singh against Rakesh Tiwari, Director General of the Archaeological Survey of In...

2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)