Search Results for "housewife"

990 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 990 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Unregistered Relinquishment Deed Invalid: Daughter’s Coparcenary Rights Upheld | Karnataka HC (RFA No.100096/2019, 2026)

The plaintiff filed a suit for partition and separate possession of her 1/5th share in ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties, along ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Mesne Profit Case — Landlord Entitled to Future Mesne Profits Despite Decree Silence. Court holds that omission to award future mesne profits in eviction decree does not bar separate proceedings under Order 20 Rule 12 CPC.

The present Second Appeal arises out of a judgment and decree dated 03.10.2022 passed by the learned District Judge-1, Bhandara in Regular Civil Appea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Incorrect Multiplier and Omission of Future Prospects. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.5,96,761 to Rs.7,26,700 with 9% Interest for Deceased Aged 45 Years Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Smt. Tarawati, aged 45 years, died in a road accident on 07.02.2003 due to r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry and Cruelty Case Due to Settlement Between Parties — Compromise Reached in Matrimonial Dispute Under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 494 IPC and DP Act

The petitioners, who are the husband and his relatives, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Subsequently Added Defendants Seeking Cross-Examination of Plaintiff in Civil Suit. Right to Cross-Examine Is a Valuable Right Not Lost by Delayed Joinder Under Order 18 Rule 17A of CPC.

The petitioners were subsequently added as party defendants in Special Civil Suit No.70 of 2007 on 14/9/2010. After being added, they filed their writ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Adverse Possession — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Misapplication of Burden of Proof and Failure to Consider Documentary Evidence.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal representatives of the original plaintiff, Kuiro Bhikaro Gaonkar (deceased), against the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Land Dispute Case — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind by First Appellate Court. The Court Held That the First Appellate Court Must Comply with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC and Decide the Appeal on Merits After Proper Appreciation of Evidence.

The present second appeals arise from a land dispute between the appellants (original plaintiffs) and the respondents (original defendants) concerning...