Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Mesne Profit Case — Landlord Entitled to Future Mesne Profits Despite Decree Silence. Court holds that omission to award future mesne profits in eviction decree does not bar separate proceedings under Order 20 Rule 12 CPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 108
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present Second Appeal arises out of a judgment and decree dated 03.10.2022 passed by the learned District Judge-1, Bhandara in Regular Civil Appeal No.61/2018. The appellants (original plaintiffs) had filed a suit for eviction and possession against the respondent (Maharashtra State Ware Housing Corporation) being S.C.S. No.29/1997. The suit was decreed on 30.04.2002, and the decree awarded mesne profits for the period prior to the filing of the suit but was silent regarding future mesne profits from the date of institution till delivery of possession. Subsequently, the appellants filed Special Mesne Profit Case No.1/2004 under Order 20 Rule 12 CPC for determination of future mesne profits. The trial court allowed the application on 11.11.2011, but the appellate court reversed that decision on 03.10.2022, holding that the decree's silence barred such a separate application. The High Court framed the substantial question of law: whether the omission in the eviction decree to award future mesne profits bars the landlord from filing a separate application for determination of mesne profits under Order 20 Rule 12 CPC. The High Court analyzed Order 20 Rule 12 CPC and Section 2(12) CPC, and held that the decree-holder is entitled to apply for determination of future mesne profits even if the decree is silent, as the right to mesne profits is a continuing right until possession is delivered. The court also noted that the application was within limitation. Consequently, the High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the appellate court's judgment, and restored the trial court's order directing an enquiry into mesne profits.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Mesne Profits - Order 20 Rule 12 CPC - Future Mesne Profits - The omission in the eviction decree to award future mesne profits does not bar the landlord from filing a separate application for determination of mesne profits under Order 20 Rule 12 CPC. The court held that the decree-holder is entitled to apply for determination of future mesne profits even if the decree is silent, as the right to mesne profits is a continuing right until possession is delivered. (Paras 10-15)

B) Civil Procedure - Mesne Profits - Section 2(12) CPC - Definition - Mesne profits are defined as profits which the person in wrongful possession actually received or might have received with ordinary diligence. The court emphasized that mesne profits are compensatory in nature and not penal. (Para 6)

C) Civil Procedure - Mesne Profits - Limitation - The application for determination of mesne profits must be filed within three years from the date of decree or from the date of delivery of possession, as per Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The court held that the application in this case was within limitation. (Paras 16-18)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the omission in the eviction decree to award future mesne profits bars the landlord from filing a separate application for determination of mesne profits under Order 20 Rule 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Second Appeal allowed. Judgment and decree dated 03.10.2022 of District Judge-1, Bhandara set aside. Judgment and decree dated 11.11.2011 of Civil Judge Junior Division, Bhandara in Special Mesne Profit Case No.1/2004 restored. The trial court is directed to proceed with enquiry into mesne profits as per law.

Law Points

  • Mesne profits
  • Future mesne profits
  • Order 20 Rule 12 CPC
  • Section 2(12) CPC
  • Decree silent on future mesne profits
  • Separate proceedings for mesne profits
  • Enquiry into mesne profits
  • Limitation for mesne profits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (10) 150

Second Appeal No. 79 of 2023

2025-10-17

Rohit W Joshi

Mr. C. S. Kaptan, Sr. Advocate a/b. Mr. H. N. Verma for appellants; Mr. N. R. Saboo for respondent

Smt. Sudhadevi W/o. Ramakant Loiya & Ors.

Maharashtra State Ware Housing Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second Appeal against appellate judgment dismissing mesne profit application

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought restoration of trial court order directing enquiry into future mesne profits

Filing Reason

Appellants challenged appellate court's decision that omission in eviction decree barred separate mesne profit proceedings

Previous Decisions

Trial court allowed mesne profit application on 11.11.2011; appellate court reversed on 03.10.2022

Issues

Whether omission in eviction decree to award future mesne profits bars separate application under Order 20 Rule 12 CPC

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that Order 20 Rule 12 CPC permits separate application for mesne profits even if decree is silent Respondent argued that decree's silence amounts to rejection of future mesne profits

Ratio Decidendi

The omission in the eviction decree to award future mesne profits does not bar the landlord from filing a separate application for determination of mesne profits under Order 20 Rule 12 CPC. The right to mesne profits is a continuing right until possession is delivered, and the decree-holder is entitled to apply for determination even if the decree is silent.

Judgment Excerpts

The omission in the decree to award future mesne profits does not bar the landlord from filing a separate application for determination of mesne profits under Order 20 Rule 12 CPC. The right to mesne profits is a continuing right until possession is delivered.

Procedural History

Appellants filed S.C.S. No.29/1997 for eviction and possession, decreed on 30.04.2002. They then filed Special Mesne Profit Case No.1/2004 under Order 20 Rule 12 CPC for future mesne profits. Trial court allowed it on 11.11.2011. Respondent appealed in Regular Civil Appeal No.61/2018, which was allowed on 03.10.2022, dismissing the mesne profit case. Appellants filed Second Appeal No.79/2023 in the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 20 Rule 12, Section 2(12)
  • Limitation Act, 1963: Article 137
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Modifies Maintenance Order in Favor of Wife and Son Under Section 125 CrPC — Maintenance Granted from Date of Application. The court held that maintenance under Section 125 CrPC can be granted from the date of application, and the...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Land Acquisition Writ Petition Restoration Case Due to Timely Filing and Bona Fide Belief. Restoration Application Filed Within One Month of Dismissal Was Admitted by State and Should Have Been Considered on Merits, ...