Search Results for "female accused"

723 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 723 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Sections 376 and 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment of acquittal dated 24 July...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Relative for Sexual Assault of 11-Year-Old Girl under POCSO Act and IPC. Court holds that showing obscene pictures to a child constitutes sexual assault and that the victim's testimony is credible despite minor inconsistencies.

The appellant, Mahadev Gurling Kamble, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act, Sangli, for offences punishable under Section 354A(i)(2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Sections 376, 452, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vijay Ramrao Mohod, was convicted by the 2nd Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Sessions Trial No.14/2005 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajratan Sahebrao Nawghare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.10/2013 for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeals in Gang Rape Case; Convicts Challenge Conviction and State Seeks Enhancement of Sentence. Accused Were Convicted Under Sections 376(2)(g) and 366 IPC for Gang Rape of Two Minor Girls and Sentenced to 10 Years Rigorous Imprisonment.

Criminal appeals arising from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No. 121 of 1994 were taken up by the High Court of Judica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Rajesh @ Venkatesha @ Raja @ Raju, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu, Madikeri, in Sessions Case No.58/2006 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC for Smothering and Staging Fire. High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Trial Verdict.

The present appeal arises from the judgment and order dated 6th January, 2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur in Sessions Trial No.59 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Penetration.

The appellant, Momin Mazhar alias Babbu, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act...