Bombay High Court Directs Police to Pay Compensation for Violation of Section 46(4) CrPC in Arrest of Woman Without Female Constable. The court held that the arrest of a woman by a male police officer without a female constable and without recording reasons violates the mandatory provision of Section 46(4) CrPC and the right to privacy under Article 21.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 112
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mrs. Bharati S. Khandhar, filed a writ petition seeking compensation and action against police officers for violating Section 46(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. On 13th June 2007, the petitioner was stopped by Respondent No.1, a male police sub-inspector, who demanded she accompany him to the police station without specifying any offence. Despite her request for a female constable, one was called only after her insistence. She was taken to the police station in a police van and detained for some time before being released without any charge. The court examined whether the arrest violated Section 46(4) CrPC, which mandates that a woman be arrested only by a female police officer unless circumstances require otherwise and reasons are recorded. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with this mandatory provision, as no reasons were recorded for not having a female constable at the time of arrest. The court held that the arrest was illegal and infringed upon the petitioner's right to privacy and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court directed Respondent No.1 to pay compensation of Rs. 50,000 to the petitioner within four weeks, failing which interest would accrue. The petition was disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Arrest of Woman - Section 46(4) CrPC - Mandatory Requirement - The arrest of a woman must be made only by a female police officer, unless the circumstances require otherwise and the reasons are recorded. In this case, the petitioner was arrested by a male police officer without a female constable initially, and the reasons for not doing so were not recorded. Held that the arrest was illegal and violated the petitioner's fundamental rights. (Paras 1-17)

B) Constitutional Law - Right to Privacy - Article 21 - Arrest of Woman - The arrest of a woman without a female constable infringes upon her right to privacy and dignity. The court held that the state must pay compensation for such violation. (Paras 18-25)

C) Criminal Procedure - Compensation for Illegal Arrest - Section 357A CrPC - The court directed the respondent police officer to pay compensation of Rs. 50,000 to the petitioner for the gross violation of Section 46(4) CrPC and for the harassment caused. (Paras 26-30)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the arrest of a woman without the presence of a female constable and without proper reasons violates Section 46(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation for such violation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and directed Respondent No.1 to pay compensation of Rs. 50,000 to the petitioner within four weeks, failing which interest at 9% per annum would accrue. The court also directed the Commissioner of Police to take appropriate action against Respondent No.1 for violating Section 46(4) CrPC.

Law Points

  • Arrest of woman without female constable violates Section 46(4) CrPC
  • Right to privacy of woman arrested
  • Compensation for violation of fundamental rights
  • Police accountability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (12) 75

Criminal Writ Petition No.453 of 2008

2012-12-21

A.S. Oka, S.S. Shinde

Ms. Veena Thadani i/by Mr. Shreeram Shirsat for the Petitioner; Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State

Mrs. Bharati S. Khandhar

Shri. Maruti Govind Jadhav, PSI; Shri. Anant Bapu Gurav, PSI; The Commissioner of Police; Home Minister; The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking compensation and action against police officers for illegal arrest and violation of Section 46(4) CrPC.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to Respondent No.1 to pay compensation for gross violation of law, action against respondent officers for violation of Section 46(4) CrPC, and direction to desist from harassing petitioner and her family.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was arrested by a male police officer without a female constable and without being informed of the offence, causing harassment and violation of her rights.

Issues

Whether the arrest of the petitioner violated Section 46(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973? Whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation for the illegal arrest and violation of her fundamental rights?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that her arrest by a male police officer without a female constable violated Section 46(4) CrPC and her right to privacy under Article 21. Respondent-State argued that the arrest was lawful and that a female constable was called later, but did not provide reasons for not having one at the time of arrest.

Ratio Decidendi

The arrest of a woman must be made only by a female police officer as per Section 46(4) CrPC, unless circumstances require otherwise and reasons are recorded. Failure to comply renders the arrest illegal and violates the woman's right to privacy and dignity under Article 21, entitling her to compensation.

Judgment Excerpts

The arrest of a woman must be made only by a female police officer, unless the circumstances require otherwise and the reasons are recorded. The petitioner was arrested by a male police officer without a female constable, and no reasons were recorded for not having one. This is a gross violation of Section 46(4) CrPC.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.453 of 2008 before the Bombay High Court on 13th June 2007 after the incident. The petition was reserved on 11th December 2012 and pronounced on 21st December 2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 46(4)
  • Constitution of India: Article 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Police to Pay Compensation for Violation of Section 46(4) CrPC in Arrest of Woman Without Female Constable. The court held that the arrest of a woman by a male police officer without a female constable and without recording ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Army Officer with 60% Permanent Disability in Motor Accident Claim. Claimant's loss of promotion prospects and future earnings considered under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.