Search Results for "execution proceedings"

89 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Invalidates Ex Parte Arbitration Awards; Upholds Principles of Party Autonomy

Existence of Arbitration Agreement: Whether the purported arbitration agreement dated 01.04.1957 was valid and enforceable. Unilateral Appointment of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Post-Award Interest in Arbitration: Supreme Court Clarifies Computation. Determining if post-award interest applies to principal only or includes pre-award interest.

This case revolves around the North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. M/S S.A. Builders Ltd., in which the key issue pertains to post-award interest unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Judgment on Maintainability of Appeals in Execution Proceedings of Arbitral Awards" "Establishing the primacy of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act over procedural laws for appealability."

1. Introduction The case involved the maintainability of appeals against an order disposing of execution proceedings for an arbitral award. The core ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Possession Relief in Specific Performance Decree: Supreme Court Clarifies Law. Even without an express relief for possession in a specific performance decree, the court can enforce possession rights under the Specific Relief Act and Transfer of Property Act.

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s order that directed the executing court to hand over possession to the decree-holder, even though the decr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Pendente Lite Transferee's Right to Challenge Execution of Decree Confirmed: Supreme Court" SC affirms that limitation period begins from the date of final decree, and a pendente lite transferee can challenge execution if dispossessed.

The Supreme Court of India, deals with the execution of a final decree in a partition suit and the rights of a pendente lite transferee. It affirms th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Dismissed: Appellate and Trial Court Decree Confirmed for Eviction of Defendant from Suit Premises. Legal heirs of the defendant fail to claim protected tenancy under Bombay Rent Act, 1947 after license expiry; Indian Railways ownership claim dismissed as irrelevant.

Writ petition challenging the eviction order passed by the Small Causes Court, the court dismissed the defendant's claim for protected tenancy under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Resolves Dispute over Shareholding in Hospital Project. Specific Performance Decree Enforces Sale of 50% Shares Amid Conflicting Bids and Automatic Sale Clause Dispute.

The Bombay High Court delivered a judgment concerning a business dispute between Ashok Kumar Kothari and Sanwarlal Agarwal over the shareholding of a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Execution Court's Jurisdiction to Extend Time for Deposit in Specific Performance Case. Application for Extension of Time and Rescission Must be Treated as Part of Original Suit, Not Execution Proceedings.

The Supreme Court of India upheld the jurisdiction of the Execution Court to extend the time for depositing the balance sale consideration in a specif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Restores Original Decision, Declares Contempt Petition Time-Barred. High Court Review Overstepped Jurisdiction; Importance of Adhering to Limitation Periods in Contempt Proceedings Emphasized

The  judgment addresses a contempt petition regarding the failure of a Tahsildar to effect a mutation ordered by a Single Judge. The Division Bench (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Executing Court's Decision, Rejects Jurisdictional Objections and Abuse of Process. Possession warrant stands as Appellate Bench's reversal deemed erroneous; Writ Petition allowed, reinforcing res judicata and legal precedents.

The Executing Court had issued a possession warrant on 19 April 2024, which Respondent No. 1 failed to challenge. Respondent No. 1's subsequent object...