Search Results for "excess work"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "excess work"

1447 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1447 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Recovery of Excess Payment Under Time Bound Promotion Scheme. Recovery of Rs.2,58,711/- Set Aside as No Misrepresentation by Employee and Recovery Ordered Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

16 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Ajabrao Rambhau Patil, was appointed as Technical Assistant on 16.02.1982 in the office of respondent no.3. The post was later abolish...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Challenge to Recovery of Excess Pension Paid Due to Mistaken Inclusion of Promotional Increment. Recovery of excess payment after six years of retirement held impermissible as per principles against recovery from retired employees.

3 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Tarachand s/o Urkudaji Gajbhiye, a retired government employee, was aggrieved by an order dated 19.1.2016 issued by respondent No. 2, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition Against Pay Reduction and Recovery Order — Recovery of Excess Payment Set Aside Due to No Misrepresentation. Pay Fixation Error by Employer Cannot Be Recovered from Employee Without Show Cause Notice.

2 May 2019

The petitioner, Premchand Nathu Patil, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 16.06.1989 in a secondary school run by respondent No. 5 institute. He...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Retired Medical Officer's Petition against Recovery of Excess Pay under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Recovery Upheld Because Officer Had Given Undertaking and Was Not a Class-III or IV Employee. The Court held that the protections against recovery from retired employees under State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih do not apply when the employee has given an undertaking to refund excess payments, and Rule 134A of the Pension Rules expressly permits such recovery.

10 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Dr. Ravindra Shamrao Darunte, retired as a Medical Officer on 31 July 2015. The Accountant General (A&E), respondent No. 3, acting on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Excess Payment Case — Recovery from Pension Without Opportunity of Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Recovery of Rs.1,35,513/- from pension of retired Extension Officer set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice.

1 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Dattatraya s/o Kalu Patil, was appointed as Extension Officer (Statistics) by the Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon on 19.10.1994. He was grante...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Loss of Earning Capacity Cannot Be Assessed at 100% Without Medical Evidence. Commissioner's Award Set Aside for Disregarding Medical Assessment and Schedule Prescribing Loss of Earning Capacity Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

27 Nov 2014

The appellant, National Insurance Company Limited, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Employee’s Challenge to Recovery of Excess Pay from Pension Benefits. Court Holds That Voluntary Undertakings Bind Employee and Recovery Is Permissible Under Rule 134A of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, Distinguishing Rafiq Masih Based on Jagdev Singh.

6 May 2025

The petitioner, a retired Registrar of the District Court, Osmanabad, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary from Retired Employee's Pension. Recovery from retiral dues set aside as employee did not misrepresent and pay fixation was departmental error.

23 Sep 2025

The Petitioner, Vinay Mhatre, was appointed as a Tracer in the Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (formerly Maharashtra Water Supply & Sewerage Project Bo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Quashing Labour Cess Demand Under Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996. The Court held that the cess demand was invalid as the contract work did not constitute 'building or other construction work' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996, and the levy under Sections 3(1) and (2) of the Cess Act was not applicable.

12 May 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a special leave petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Frames Points for Consideration in Regular First Appeal Against Dismissal of Recovery Suit in Construction Contract Dispute. Plaintiffs Claimed Excess Payment and Defective Work; Court's Final Order Not Available in Provided Text.

19 Sep 2019

Background: The dispute concerned a construction contract for a residential house in Bangalore. The plaintiffs (appellants) were the owners who had en...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)